MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3028499874 · doi:10.1242/jeb.227082

Swallow mums push metabolic limits when they can keep cool

2020· article· en· W3028499874 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathryn Knight

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiquePhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommitEcologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Parenting is not for the faint hearted. Dedicated tree swallow mums and dads commit themselves to 16 h of exertion each day, snapping up insects for their ravenous offspring. And they maintain this herculean effort for up to 22 days until their young are ready to leave the nest. It seems there are no limits to the lengths these parents will go. But Simon Tapper and Gary Burness from Trent University, Canada, with Joseph Nocera from the University of New Brunswick, Canada, weren't so sure. Tapper explains that the amount of energy a warm-blooded animal can invest in rearing its young – which is the most energetically demanding time of any animal's life – seems to be restricted by the amount of heat it can dispose of. However, most of the evidence supporting the idea is based on the experiences of new mouse mothers. Also, it wasn't clear how much of an effect lifestyle might have on an animal's ability to remain cool. Thinking about parent tree swallows, Tapper and colleagues wondered whether the industrious mothers might be able to labour even harder while raising their young if they were able to lose more heat through a bald patch in their feathers.Staking out nesting boxes in two nearby nature reserves, Tapper waited until clutches of tree swallow eggs hatched before briefly capturing the new mothers and gently snipping off the feathers covering the patch of warm skin that they use to incubate their eggs. He also inserted a minute tag into the necks of both parents to record when they returned to feed their demanding brood, in addition to keeping track of the weather conditions and monitoring the hatchlings as they grew.Initially, it looked as though the trimmed mothers weren't working any harder than females with an intact plumage; both visited their offspring roughly every 5.2 min. It was only when the team factored in the effect of the weather that the trimmed mums seemed to have an advantage. They were able to push themselves 25% harder than the untrimmed females on hot days, making an average of 43 more foraging trips per day to feed their young, although the trimmed mothers struggled to keep up with the untrimmed mothers’ feeding rate on chillier days. In addition, the trimmed mums were able to make ∼3 more visits per hour to their nests than the untrimmed females when feeding large broods of 7 nestlings. Most impressively, the offspring of the trimmed mums piled on the grams faster than the hatchlings of untrimmed mothers, weighing 1.82 g more when they departed, and they had better chances of survival after leaving the nest.It seems that the exertions of tree swallow mothers are restricted by the amount of heat that they can lose from their bodies, explaining why mothers that had had feathers removed were able to forage more on hot days than those with a full set of feathers that could overheat. However, the team suspects that the boosted growth of the trimmed mothers’ chicks could have more to do with the extra warmth available through their mother's bald patch. They are also concerned that rising temperatures caused by climate change could place chicks at greater risk, as their frenetic parents may be unable to meet their relentless demands as a consequence of heat exhaustion, making it harder for the chicks to grow swiftly to join their parents on the wing.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental Biology→Même sujetPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→Travaux en français237 207→