Current Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obesity and Examining the Causal Pathway Between Obesity and Food Insecurity in Canadian Adolescents and Young Adults (12–24)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of obesity in Canadian adolescents and young adults between 12 to 24 years of age and to examine the causal mechanism between food insecurity and obesity using the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS): 2015–16 data. We analyzed the CCHS 2015–16 data for population aged 12 to 24 from 8 provinces and 2 territories. Obesity was determined from self-reported height and weight measurements. Covariates ranging from socio demographic characteristics, food insecurity, physical activity and daily consumption of fruits and vegetables as well as multiple interaction terms were tested for association with obesity. A multivariable weighted logistic regression model was fitted and strength of association was informed by odds ratios estimates and confidence intervals. Direct and indirect effects of multiple mediators were tested to explore the association between food insecurity and obesity. More than one-fifth of the Canadian adolescents aged 12 to 24 years were obese and the highest rate of obesity was found in Québec. Household food insecurity significantly predicted obesity among adolescents (OR = 1.818, 95% CI: 1.19–2.75). We observed adolescents that consumed fruits and vegetable 5 to 10 times a day had significantly lower odds of being obese (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51–0.91). In addition, adolescents from severe food insecure households were three times more likely to be obese compared to the food secure households (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.15–8.94). We also found, interaction between age and sex, age and household food insecurity, times of vegetables and fruits consumption and sex significantly predicted the probability of obesity. We found a marginal mediation effect by self-perceived mental health on the association between household food insecurity and obesity among Canadian adolescents and young adults age 12 to 24 years. Our findings suggests even in a high income country setting, food insecurity persists and it is a significant predictor of obesity among adolescents and young adults (12–24). Age and sex moderates the association whereas we see a marginal mediation through self-perceived mental health. N/A.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».