First report of ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum’ causing leaf discoloration and wilting in tamarillo and cape gooseberry in Ecuador
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
'Candidatus' Liberibacter species are unculturable bacteria associated with economically devastating diseases of citrus, potato and other crops (Liefting et al., 3). In North and Central America and Oceania, 'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum' (CLso) haplotypes A and B, are associated with emerging diseases in solanaceous plants, including potato, tomato, pepper, tamarillo and cape gooseberry (Liefting et al., 3). Recently in Ecuador, CLso haplotype A was detected in potato and its vector Bactericera cockerelli (Caicedo et al., 1). In Ecuador, tamarillo and cape gooseberry are widely grown and are important commodities for their nutritional value and export potential. During August to December 2019, symptoms resembling those of CLso infection were observed in commercial fields of tamarillo (Solanum betaceum) and cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) (approximately 2 hectares per crop) in Pichincha and Imbabura provinces of Ecuador. Symptoms in tamarillo were pink coloration of new leaves (<10% incidence; Fig. 1) and shoot proliferation (c. 30 % incidence; Fig. 2), similar to those described in New Zealand (SPHDS, 6), and wilting in young plants (c. 40% incidence; Fig. 3), a symptom previously undescribed. Symptoms in cape gooseberry were purpling (c. 20% incidence) and yellowing leaves (c. 50% incidence) (Fig. 4). No symptoms were described in cape gooseberry previously (Liefting et al., 2). High population densities of B. cockerelli, were observed in both crops. Diseased and asymptomatic tamarillo and cape gooseberry were tested for presence of CLso. Six composite diseased samples (10 plants per sample) were collected, three tamarillo (M3-T-Pi, M6-T-Pi and M7-T-Pi) and one cape gooseberry sample (M8-C-Pi) from Pichincha, and two tamarillo samples from Imbabura (M4-T-Im and M5-T-Im). All samples were taken from different symptomatic trees. For each crop in both provinces one composite asymptomatic sample (5 plants per sample) was tested. DNA was extracted from 0.2 g of petioles and midribs using the Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Canada) (Caicedo et al., 1). To amplify the partial sequence of 16S rRNA gene, conventional PCR was done using the CLipo-F/OI2c primer pair (Secor et al., 5). Amplicons of the expected size for CLso (1.1 kb) were observed from all diseased samples. No amplification was observed for asymptomatic samples. Six positive amplicons were sequenced in both directions using the Sanger method. BLAST analysis of the 16S rRNA gene showed 100% nucleotide identity to the corresponding sequence of CLso taxid: 556287 (GenBank Accession No. EU834131) and with strains from potato in Ecuador (MN396642-43). Alignment of all sequences of CLso from this study revealed three conserved single nucleotide polymorphism mutations (g.212T>G, g.581T>C and g.1049A>G) (Nelson et al., 4), confirming that CLso haplotype A infects tamarillo and cape gooseberry in Ecuador. DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (MN396639, M3-T-Pi; MT036058, M6-T-Pi; MT036059, M7-T-Pi; MN396640, M4-T-Im; MN396641, M5-T-Im; and MT036060, M8-C-Pi). A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on partial 16S rRNA sequences by the maximum likelihood method (Tamura Nei Model) with 2000 bootstrap replications. The tree revealed that all sequences in this study were grouped with the clade belonging to CLso with a bootstrap of 100% (Fig. 5). This is the first report of CLso haplotype A in tamarillo and cape gooseberry in Ecuador, and its association with wilting in tamarillo, and yellowing and purpling leaves in cape gooseberry. These findings will support governmental plans to minimise the impact of the disease. This work was supported financially by the Dirección General de Investigación de la Universidad Central del Ecuador, project number DI-CONV-2019-074.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».