MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3031880233 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.12813

Putting AI at the Centre of Heart Failure Care

2020· letter· en· W3031880233 sur OpenAlex
Chantal F. Ski, David R. Thompson, Hans‐Peter Brunner‐La Rocca

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueESC Heart Failure · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Health and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesInterregEuropean CommissionQueen's UniversityMaastricht Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversiteit MaastrichtQueen's University Belfast
Mots-clésMedicineHealth careHeart failurePopulation ageingPopulationPrecision medicineDigital RevolutionIntensive care medicineArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceEconomic growthEnvironmental healthPathologyCardiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic affecting over 40 million people worldwide and imposing a considerable human and economic burden.1-3 At least 1–2% of the global healthcare budget is spent on HF, costs driven primarily by hospitalizations, many of which are regarded as preventable.3-5 Worryingly, the prevalence of HF is increasing substantially alongside increases in predisposing diseases and co-morbidities (i.e. diabetes, hypertension, and obesity), a growing ‘Western lifestyle’ in developing countries, and an ageing population worldwide,1, 6, 7 together imposing unsustainable demands on our healthcare systems. A new vision of care is required, one that embraces digital technologies to drive fundamental change in HF healthcare. Artificial intelligence (AI), a rapidly evolving field in medicine, especially cardiology, is revolutionizing risk prediction and stratification, diagnostics, precision medicine, workflows, and efficiency.8-10 In a strategic paper, we [PAtient Self-care uSing eHealth In chrONic Heart Failure (PASSION-HF) consortium] propose using digital therapeutics powered by AI as a personalized approach to HF self-care.11 PASSION-HF aims to develop a virtual ‘doctor at home’ system. Being able to pool datasets smartly and extrapolating relevance at an individual level, our AI approach offers huge potential for reducing clinician burden, improving clinical efficacy, and enhancing patient experience and outcomes.11 AI techniques are transforming cardiovascular diagnosis through interpreting and finding meaning in vast sets of data, faster and more effectively than the human brain.8 Machine learning, the most common application of AI, is characterized by the ability to learn from data without being explicitly programmed. Through the development of reinforcement learning algorithms, machine learning recognizes patterns in new data to create its own logic to continuously improve cardiovascular disease prediction and diagnosis.9 Accordingly, AI is able to deal with enormous combinations of multi-markers, essential in the prediction and prevention of deterioration of complex diseases like HF. Even so, such predictive models are largely dependent on high-quality large-scale datasets that are not easily accessible, and datasets of poorer quality may lead to biases with subsequent decrease in the predictive accuracy of models.12 However, through strategic selection of underlying data and use of sensitivity checks, algorithm developers can mitigate AI bias.12 This in itself accentuates the need for transparency, reproducibility, and standard reporting guidelines, which have recently been proposed and implemented in AI and machine learning.13, 14 The ability of AI to mimic the human brain and even overcome bias is fast contributing to the conceptualization of personalized precision medicine. However, overwhelmingly, the focus has been on diagnosis and risk prediction.15 Evidence demonstrating applications of AI in clinical decision-making are not only lacking but also essential if we are to advance into an era of precision medicine. Only then is AI likely to take over the routine part of a physician's workload, allowing them to spend more quality time with their patients and improve patient engagement. The future application of AI in HF care offers immense possibilities. For healthcare providers, AI has the potential to decrease risk of adverse events, patient waiting times, and per capita costs whilst increasing accessibility, productivity, and overall patient experience.10 For clinicians, AI has the capability to reduce workloads and margin of error and improve needs-led patient–doctor interactions and therapeutic decision-making.9, 11 For patients, AI can empower them through increased knowledge, shared decision-making, and self-efficacy in disease management, ultimately improving their health and well-being.11 Although AI has the ability to overcome many of the key challenges posed by the prevailing HF pandemic, some caution is warranted as it is a rapidly evolving science. Transparency regarding the quality of data, population representativeness, and performance assessment will be imperative.14 Discussions regarding legal, technical, and regulatory challenges should involve clinicians, informatics and IT experts, regulators, and patients and carers and prioritize ethics and equity. The diversity of AI development teams will mandate interdisciplinary integration to achieve adoption, utility, safety, and inclusion all under the auspices of a new philosophy of care—AI-enabled care.11 Although the landscape of HF care may be changing, the patient–doctor relationship will not be entirely replaced by AI. However, those who do not use AI will, in all probability, be replaced by those who do. AI is the new tool in the toolbox that is already transforming cardiology. The PASSION-HF consortium see AI as an enabler to personalize medicine and to optimize effective HF self-care in consideration of disease complexity. By adding value and precision to the management of HF, providing equitable and affordable care access, and improving patient expectation and outcomes, AI is transforming HF care. This paper is written on behalf of the PAtient Self-care uSing eHealth In chrONic Heart Failure (PASSION-HF) consortium. None declared. This project, PAtient Self-care uSing eHealth In chrONic Heart Failure (PASSION-HF), is supported by INTERREG-NWE VB (NWE 702) (http://www.nweurope.eu/projects/project-search/passion-hf-patient-self-care-using-ehealth-in-chronic-heart-failure/) funded by the European Commission.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle