Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Florence Nightingale at First Hand. By Lynn McDonald. (Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2010, Pp. xv, 197. CN $24.95); Florence Nightingale's Suggestions for Thought, Volume 11 of the Collected Works of Florence Nightingak. Edited by Lynn McDonald. (Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2008, Pp. xiv, 794. CN $150.00.) Justly famous as the founder of modern nursing, Florence Nightingale's fame has endured from the 1850s until today. The two books under review here provide ample evidence as to why this should be so. As both author and editor Lynn McDonald has spent much of her professional career probing virtually every aspect of Nightingale's ninety years of life. And what an amazingly productive life it was, which Nightingale's sixteen-volume Collected Works - edited principally by McDonald - makes clear. But if the received public image of Nightingale continues to be that of the Lady of the Lamp, then both her own Suggestions for Thought and McDonald's short biography - published to mark the centenary of Nightingale's death - show her to have been a hard-headed, clear-thinking reformer, in addition to a heroic nurse. Born into wealth and social standing, Nightingale was raised to be an English gentlewoman. But in 1836, at the age of sixteen, she received a call to diat changed her life. The kind of service she had in mind was that of nurse. Her parents, however, would not allow it. Nursing was then the province of the lower classes and as such it was regarded as wholly unrespectable. Eventually, and despite the social opprobrium in which nursing was held, young Florence was allowed to travel to Germany and France in order to both observe and gain practical nursing experience with Lutheran deaconesses and Roman Catholic nuns. Following these experiences she was determined to devote herself to the nursing vocation. Her persistence finally convinced her father to bestow upon her an annuity in 1853, which she used to become the superintendent of a small hospital for women of means in London. While there Nightingale quickly turned herself into a knowledgeable nursing practitioner, with a keen eye for modernization. By 1854, her reputation in the field was such that she was asked by the British Government (she volunteered at approximately the same time) to travel to the Barracks Hospital at Scutari to see if the appalling mortality rate of Britain's Crimean War solthers could be reduced. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,502 | 0,341 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».