MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3033845667 · doi:10.1353/mss.2017.0034

Lyrical Weapons of War: The Poet's Corner in Civil War Soldier Newspapers

2017· article· en· W3033845667 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Berkey

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œMississippi quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAmerican History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryNewspaperSpanish Civil WarLawHistoryLiteratureJournalismArt historyArtPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lyrical Weapons of War:The Poet's Corner in Civil War Soldier Newspapers James Berkey In a March 1865 column titled "Pen Sketches; Some Words to Contributors," the editors of the Army Argus and Crisis, a peripatetic Confederate newspaper with a large soldier audience, announced a surprising literary predicament. At that late and increasingly bleak moment in the South, the editors confessed: "Our drawer fairly groans under the weight of prose and poetic contributions." Aspiring to publish "an unrivalled news and literary journal," they offered both practical and poetic advice to potential contributors, beseeching those "who disfigure their compositions with heavy, unintelligible words" that "would puzzle a decipherer of Egyptian hyerogliphics [sic]" to use "plain and sensible" language ("Pen Sketches" 4). Such a difficulty would hardly have surprised the Argus and Crisis's veteran Confederate publishers, army printer William F. Wisely and Missouri fire-eater Joseph Tucker, who had been corralling soldiers' literary scribblings into print since launching the Missouri Army Argus as the organ of General Sterling Price's forces in 1861.1 The Army Argus and Crisis was scarcely alone in exercising sharp literary judgment. Lamenting the quality if not the poetic impulse of their contributors, the Union editors of the Army Mail Bag, in a piece fittingly titled "Poetry (?)," noted that "there is no end to the effusions called poetry which have emanated from soldiers," before observing that these "anxious candidate[s] for poetical honors" generally produced "a very long string of dogerel [sic], with rhyme but with out reason." The Cavalier, another Union sheet published in Williamsburg and Yorktown from 1862 to 1864, admonished hopeful authors about the aesthetic values guiding their selections. Rejecting one piece titled "Unfurl the Glorious Banner" for being "considerably below the poetical standard of the Cavalier," they implored the aspiring poet to "study the rules of [End Page 471] versification, and acquire a more extensive and thorough knowledge of some other branches of literature" ("To Our Contributors"). As an example of "true poetry," they elsewhere cited Schiller's "The Battle" for its "sublime majesty" and "real fire" ("Select Poetry"). In reprinting selections from such luminaries as Schiller (as well as prominent American poets like William Cullen Bryant and Oliver Wendell Holmes), the Cavalier. offered its pages as a pedagogical medium for the amateur poets filling its ranks. Poetry was an indispensable part of the Civil War print diet, as Alice Fahs, Eliza Richards, Faith Barrett, and others have shown, so it should hardly be surprising that soldier newspapers would become sites of poetic aspiration and inspiration for their soldier-readers.2 Scholars like Barrett and Cristanne Miller have painstakingly recovered Civil War soldiers' unpublished poetry, and others have examined the patriotic amateur poetry that appeared in popular periodicals and contemporaneous collections like Frank Moore's The Rebellion Record. But soldier newspapers have yet to be exhumed for their vital role in what Fahs aptly describes as the "war as a literary event" (4). Amidst the incessant drumbeat of war news, many papers continued the practice of the poet's corner, although seldom so named, by placing original and selected poetry in the upper left-hand corner of their front pages. The Soldier's Letter of the Ninety-Sixth Illinois Regiment in Harrodsburg, Kentucky, and the Union Volunteer in Louisville christened their poet's corners, respectively, as "The Songs We Sing" and "Poems of the Hour," establishing a shared lyric culture for soldiers and civilians through the reproduction of popular songs and anthems like "The Battle Cry of Freedom," "The Star-Spangled Banner," "The Red, White, and Blue," "The Flag of Our Union," and "Marching On!" Soldier papers also actively partook of the nineteenth century's "culture of reprinting" (McGill), parodying and rewriting such wartime anthems as "Dixie" and "The Bonnie Blue Flag."3 In addition to these popular national songs, soldier-editors filled their columns with reprinted poetry and fiction by popular American authors like T. S. [End Page 472] Arthur, Ethel Lynn Beers, George Boker, Ned Buntline, Mary Denison, Bret Harte, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, George Root, Lydia Sigourney, Artemus Ward, John Greenleaf Whittier, Bryant, and Holmes. Soldier-editors also took pains, as the musings...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,317
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,813

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œMississippi quarterlyMême sujetAmerican History and CultureTravaux en français237 207