MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3035416487 · doi:10.1353/rah.2020.0029

Blushing at the Fair: Indigenous Workers, Academics, and Competing Modernities in the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition

2020· article· en· W3035416487 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas K. Miller

Notice bibliographique

RevueReviews in American History · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousExposition (narrative)HistoryAttendanceSociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceEconomic historyLawArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Blushing at the Fair: Indigenous Workers, Academics, and Competing Modernities in the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition Douglas K. Miller (bio) David R. M. Beck, Unfair Labor?: American Indians and the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2019. xxviii + 299 pp. Illustrations, appendix, notes, bibliography, and index. $65.00. Talking to a reporter at the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair, James Deans, a collector and agent for the Pacific Northwest Kwakwaka’wakw people, claimed, “A more honest people never lived, and their love of home and family would put many a civilized nation to a blush” (p. 13). As a stakeholder in Kwakwaka’wakw success at the fair, Deans might have been trying to rhetorically pit his favored “civilized” people against a “treacherous” people, as he characterized Sioux people, also in attendance. It could also be that he sought some credit for the romanticized attributes of the Indigenous people with whom he collaborated, or some sort of esteem through association. But then, twenty years after the Panic of 1873, thirty years after the Battle of Gettysburg, ninety years after the Louisiana Purchase, 110 years after the Treaty of Paris, 120 years after the Boston Tea Party, and 401 years after Columbus “sailed the ocean blue . . . ” (fair organizers missed their target date of 1892), here stood in Chicago Indigenous workers and tourists from the far side of the continent, exhibiting the virtues that perpetually eluded settler newcomers through all of those formative experiences. Maybe Deans was not boasting or bluffing. Maybe he was blushing. Harvard anthropologist Frederic Ward Putnam was certainly cynical about the implications that colonization (he used the euphemism “contact”) held for Indigenous peoples. “It’s the real old Native things that I am after,” he instructed a fair exhibit collector. “That which relates to the life and customs of the Indians before their art was ruined by contact with the whites” (p. 70). On one hand, Putnam confessed the corrupting power of colonization. At the same time, he implied that Native people could only produce reputable art in a state of isolated purity, and that Native art could not withstand, let alone reflect, history and change over time. Somehow in the context of a global [End Page 283] cosmopolitan event, he failed to understand that global cosmopolitanism was relative, but not unique to Western European people. Or the irony that individuals like him who fetishized notions of purity did as much to harm the value and potential for Native American art as did its subjection to cash economies. Putnam was probably not blushing. The Chicago World’s Columbian Exposition portrayed an America ascendant, but purportedly founded on traditions dating back to the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. Fair organizers arranged living exhibits of supposedly dying cultures—Arabs, Africans, Aztecs—in a fashion that rendered them support acts for the more magnificent main attractions, including Juicy Fruit gum, a 264-feet Ferris Wheel, and the Canadian Mammoth—an eleven-ton block of cheese that earned a diploma at the fair. Bear with me as I ask the obligatory following question: Were these the hallmarks of civilization? From the fair’s glaring “White City” buildings coated in cheap Acme cement plaster, to Inuit actors being forced to wear sealskin clothes that they had never worn before, to Nikola Tesla’s magic dynamo in the Electricity Hall, to the Lakota actor Short Bull posing as a Potawatomi person for a Carl Rohl-Smith sculpture because he supposedly looked more “Indian,” was it all an illusion? Not entirely. The significant number of Indigenous peoples present at the fair challenged illusory celebrations of humanity, civilization, and progress. But the power was real. How and why Native peoples attempted to harness and conduct currents of power, like those exhibited in the fair’s Electricity Hall, is the central story in David Beck’s splendid and important new book Unfair Labor? In the context of the Second Industrial Revolution, with a selective and exaggerated past on display for millions of people to consider and an uncertain future on the horizon, fairgoers above all confronted modernity, or at least some version of it defined by cash, consumerism, and colonialism. This...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,916
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,069
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReviews in American HistoryMême sujetHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisTravaux en français237 207