MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3035838632 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2019.0053

Crimes of Kitchenalia: A Miscellany of Misdeeds

2019· article· en· W3035838632 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emma Kay

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMiscellanyLawHistoryScrutinyQueen (butterfly)Political scienceClassics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Crimes of Kitchenalia: A Miscellany of Misdeeds Emma Kay (bio) The study of kitchenalia, of items relating to the kitchen, remains a relatively obscure field of research. A subcategory of this topic that has received even less scrutiny is that of crimes associated with miscellaneous [End Page 211] culinary equipment. Still, there are numerous examples to be explored. Given the heavy nature and broad accessibility of objects used for everyday purposes in the nineteenth century—many crafted from copper, brass, iron, or granite—it is perhaps unsurprising that kitchen tools were often fundamental accessories in violent crimes. One of the most common crimes involving kitchenalia during the Victorian era was, predictably, petty theft. On 8 May 1837, fifty-five-year-old Henry Allen stole a stove worth five shillings from the Hackney district of London, promptly selling it to an unsuspecting member of the community. For his sins, Allen received a sentence of seven years transportation (Trial of Henry Allen). Had he committed this theft in an earlier era, Allen’s destination would undoubtedly have been the penal colonies in America, but changes in legislation at a time of unstable political relations between Britain and the US meant that he probably ended up in Australia.1 In 1843, seventeen-year-old James Merry received ten years’ transportation for a similar crime: the theft of sugar nippers (fig. 1), together with some silk ribbon, buttons, and a needle from a milliner. The authorities found a substantial hoard of other small items in a nearby cellar that Merry was believed to be occupying (Trial of James Merry). Given the difficult circumstances in which Merry and other children like him lived, one wonders whether he might have benefited from the opportunity to start a new life abroad, assuming, that is, that he was able to survive the harsh conditions of colonial prisons.2 Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 1. Victorian Sugar Nippers and Sugar Cone, 2019. Photograph by author. Crimes of kitchenalia were not confined to the underbelly of city life. The once noisy, fashionable, and colourful pleasure gardens of Cremorne, located along the Thames in London, in an area that had been occupied by eating houses and places of entertainment, were the scene of a violent assault [End Page 212] in 1870. John Smithson and James Clark were working in a kitchen when Smithson requested help from his colleague. Clark refused to take orders and picked up a “black-handled knife, one that he was peeling potatoes with,” at which point Smithson took flight to seek help. The two cooks reunited in the cellar, where Clark grabbed Smithson by the neck, stabbing him twice in his side. Another worker, William Hall, a kitchen porter, intervened and managed to wrest the knife away. Clark maintained that the whole incident was an accident and that Smithson had fallen onto the knife. There were numerous witnesses during the hearing, some of whom thought they had seen Smithson directly stabbed, others who had not. During the trial, Clark received what was known as “a good character”; in other words, a respected member of society vouched for his name and reputation in court (Trial of James Clark). He consequently received a sentence of only four months in prison. Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 2. Georgian pestle and mortar, 2019. Photograph by author. Petty thefts and assaults aside, the murky world of kitchenalia misdemeanours extends to numerous murders, including the infamous “Pestle Murder” of 1897. Committed on the London and South Western Railway, between Hounslow and Waterloo, the crime remains unsolved to this day. The victim, Elizabeth Camp, aged thirty-three, was found battered to death in a railway carriage, her head smashed with a pestle (fig. 2). Elizabeth had worked as a housemaid at the Northern Hospital in Winchmore-Hill, London (“Pestle Murder”). There was one suspect, Arthur Marshall, who escaped the gallows based on a witness account that described the man seen leaving the carriage as clean-shaven. However, police later discovered that [End Page 213] Marshall had entered a barbershop on the day of the murder, to purchase a false moustache. The distance between the barbershop and the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,880
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetWildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesTravaux en français237 207