MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3036392583 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2019.0055

Victorian Funeral Food Customs

2019· article· en· W3036392583 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Helen Frisby

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueCulinary Culture and Tourism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoffinChapelFolkloreHistoryArtAncient historyLawArt historyArchaeologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Victorian Funeral Food Customs Helen Frisby (bio) On 1 July 1893, a funeral took place in the Shropshire town of Market Drayton. As was customary, mourners gathered at the deceased’s home before the funeral. We know what transpired because it happens that one of the mourners later told her friend, Gertrude Hope. Miss Hope belonged to the Folklore Society and subsequently published this account in the society’s journal: The minister of the chapel where the deceased woman had been a regular attendant held a short service in the cottage before the coffin was removed. The lady, who gave me the particulars, arrived rather early, and found the bearers enjoying a good lunch in the only downstairs room. Shortly afterwards the coffin was brought down and was placed on two chairs in the centre of the room, and the mourners having gathered [End Page 221] round it the service proceeded. Directly the minister ended, the woman in charge of the arrangements poured out four glasses of wine and handed one to each bearer present across the coffin, with a biscuit called a “funeral biscuit”. . . . The biscuits were ordinary sponge fingers, usually called “sponge fingers” or “lady’s fingers.” They are, however, also known in the shops of Market Drayton as “funeral biscuits.” The minister, who had lately come from Pembrokeshire, remarked to my informant that he was sorry to see that pagan custom still observed. He had been able to put an end to it in the Pembrokeshire village where he had formerly been. (Hope 292–93) Miss Hope’s account raises several points to be discussed in this essay: the historicity—actual and perceived—of Victorian funeral food customs; the systematic misunderstanding of such customs by those recording them; and the psychosocial functions of funeral food customs generally. The serving of alcohol at British funerals possesses long historical roots. Early records of English funeral hospitality customs, dating from the late Middle Ages, refer simply to “wine.” By the seventeenth century, household account books and undertakers’ bills specify the types of wine—sack, claret, and canary—regularly served at funerals. In 1719, Henri Misson noted of English funeral gatherings that “[b]efore they set out, and after they return, it is usual to present the guests with something to drink, either red or white wine, boil’d with sugar and Cinnamon, or some such Liquor” (91). By the Victorian period, “burnt wine,” “a dark-looking liquid, with a strongly aromatic smell, [which] consisted of ale spiced with cloves, nutmeg, ginger and mace” (Addy 124), featured prominently at funerals. As another Folklore correspondent noted, “[e]ven the poor had one bottle of port, of which everyone must taste” (Thompson 85). Alongside alcoholic beverages, biscuits or cake (the words were often employed interchangeably) were frequently served at affluent funerals prior to the Victorian period. Most fashionable during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries were the Naples, or Savoy variety, made with exotic ingredients such as almonds, rosewater, musk, and ambergris. Later, the recipes became simplified, as the custom percolated down the social scale; most commonly (in both senses of the word) consumed at Victorian working- class funerals were crispy sponge fingers or “coffins,” oatcake, and caraway shortcake. Special moulds were sometimes used (fig. 1), these moulds being reserved especially for the preparation of funeral biscuits. Biscuits were also distributed by way of inviting, or “bidding,” guests to the funeral. In some districts, it was customary to bid everyone within a defined geographical area and considered rude to decline without pressing reason (Thompson 85). Pairs of biscuits were wrapped in paper, which [End Page 222] was printed with a black border and suitably lugubrious verses composed to remind the recipients in no uncertain terms of their own mortality. The packets were sealed with black wax, then tied with black ribbon. A bidder wearing mourning would knock on the door and give a packet of biscuits, announcing as they did so, “You are expected to attend John Smith’s burying tomorrow at three o’clock. We bury at [place]” (Brears 189). One such bidder was “Roundlegs,” assistant to George Pearce, confectioner of Sheffield, whose funeral biscuits were so famed locally that they...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,448
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,891

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,003
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0530,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetCulinary Culture and TourismTravaux en français237 207