MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3036594999 · doi:10.1159/000508474

Love (Pancreatic Surgery) in the Time of Cholera (COVID-19)

2020· article· en· W3036594999 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigestive Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Établissements canadiensPancreas Centre (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHealth careDiseaseIntensive care medicineOutbreakMechanical ventilationEmergency medicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Editor,As of April 4, the Italian Health Ministry reports more than 120,000 total cases and 15,000 deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) nationwide [1]. Because of the striking and often unforeseeable rapidity of respiratory deterioration, about 10–25% of hospitalized patients require invasive ventilation [2]. This has led to an unprecedented challenge for healthcare providers, especially in northern Italy, the nation’s center of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak. Although Italy’s national health system has 3.2 hospital beds per 1,000 people (as compared with 2.8 in the USA), the ability to test, contain people with suspected infection, and meet the needs of critically ill patients simultaneously has been outpaced.After a time-lag of few weeks, in other countries – including the USA – hospitals are now overflowing with COVID-19 patients. With the aim of reducing unnecessary patient traffic in the hospitals, protecting the safety of healthcare professionals, and allocating potentially scarce resources for the care of COVID-19 patients, the American College of Surgeons has recommended that hospital leaderships review and curtail all elective procedures until the predicted inflection point of the SARS-CoV-2 exposure graph is reached [3]. However, most surgical cases in tertiary care hospitals are scheduled for malignancies, which will continue to progress at variable, disease-specific rates.Among solid tumors, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma portends a postoperative survival rate of only 30–35 months when a multimodal treatment strategy, including chemotherapy or chemoradiation is applied [4, 5]. Furthermore, the risk of PDAC progression with care delay is very high [6]. We herein describe the dynamics associated with SARS-CoV-2 outbreak at the Verona Pancreas Institute, a national referral center located in northern Italy and performing about 500 pancreatic resections annually. Furthermore, we discuss practical hints for patient triaging in pancreatic cancer surgery.The number of COVID-19 cases skyrocketed in Veneto region and Verona area in mid-March. Our hospital had been shortly after designated as a regional COVID hub. Because of a very rapid shortage of ventilators, non-emergent surgical procedures were initially halved and then canceled as of March 16, when the operating theaters were reshaped into makeshift ICU. After 2 weeks, thanks to the opening of additional ICU spots, pancreatic procedures were resumed at 25% of the usual volume.The shortage of operative slots calls for a framework to guide the patient selection process. More than 70% of patients operated at our institution are from outside Veneto and live a considerable distance away. Although traveling is against the principle of limiting people circulation, a selection process based primarily on geographical criteria would contrast the patient’s right of choosing his/her care providers, an important aspect in pancreatic surgery, whereby the volume-outcome correlation is well established. Nonetheless, the sharp reduction of domestic flights and high-speed train frequencies has led some patients from southern Italy to withdraw from our waiting list and seek immediate care at their local institutions.The 2nd and most important question is which type of pancreatic malignancies prioritizes for surgery. During the highest peak of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, in a “damage-control perspective,” there may be no room for pancreatic surgery because of the associated postoperative complications (with a 20% rate of ICU admission), the elevated costs, and the relatively poor oncologic outcomes as compared to other cancers. Yet, the plateau phase Italy has entered – the duration of which could be in the range of several weeks to months – will likely prolong the operative slots constraints and the surgical waiting list. Therefore, in accordance with the Italian Society of Surgery and the American College of Surgeons, an Oncological Review/Ethics Committee, composed of surgeons, oncologists, radiation oncologists, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and psycho-oncologists has been established to provide clear and equitable judgment (Fig. 1). The plans for case triage are also shared with hospital administrators to account for local circumstances and site-specific COVID-19 prevalence. Recommendations based on our approach to pancreatic surgery in a COVID hub with reduced resources for elective cancer cases are as follows:Upfront pancreatectomy for PDAC should be discouraged. The Oncological Review Committees should always consider neoadjuvant therapy, which acts as a biology equalizer at every stage of localized PDAC. Nonetheless, the authors are aware that in certain circumstances, concern may arise as to whether chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression could increase the risk of becoming seriously ill from COVID-19.Patients eligible for surgical exploration following neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy or chemoradiation should be prioritized. It has been indeed shown that the rate of post-pancreatectomy morbidity following neoadjuvant therapy is reduced, despite the clinical burden of complications could be remarkable [7]. However, there is a wide spectrum of surgical candidates following primary chemotherapy, ranging from resectable patients to patients exhibiting major solid tumor contacts with peripancreatic vasculature, in whom vascular resection is anticipated. For these latter cases with a high likelihood of prolonged operative time, blood loss, and postoperative ICU utilization, the risk of surgical delay to the individual patient must be carefully balanced against the imminent availability of these resources for patients with COVID-19.Although PDAC is by far the most common malignancy, attention should be paid to other cancer types, including ampullary and duodenal adenocarcinoma, which are associated with a better prognosis relative to PDAC. Remarkably, no neoadjuvant strategies have been established for these cancer types.All patients scheduled for pancreatectomy should be tested for SARS-CoV-2 prior to hospital admission. Positive testing imposes surgical delay and re-testing following a 14-day quarantine period.COVID-19 is a competing risk for patients requiring surgical care. Age and comorbidities should be carefully weighed against the expected oncological outcomes and the risk of severe symptoms and mortality in the circumstances of COVID-19 during the postoperative period or recovery phase.Pancreatectomies for low-grade or benign neoplasms should be delayed.These hints can be coupled with general principles provided from surgical associations around the world as we triage pancreatic cancer patients during the pandemic:The authors are aware that these recommendations are not evidence based. However, we are abruptly asked to make decisions for which many of us will not be prepared. Shared recommendations by Oncological Review Committees can help optimizing the resource allocation process and mitigate the enormous emotional burden to which we are individually exposed in an unprecedented crisis. Because of its aggressive biology, PDAC would virtually require immediate care. Many pancreatic cancer patients in Italy will receive suboptimal care or even no treatment as referral hospitals are carrying the catastrophic brunt of thousands of COVID-19 cases. These “indirect” deaths that will inevitably occur, although hard to track, should be added to the overall lethality of SARS-CoV-2 as the outbreak has finally faded away. In these difficult times, our love (pancreatic surgery) in the time of cholera (COVID-19) is tremendously struggling.All authors declare no conflicts of interest.The authors did not receive any funding.All authors contributed equally.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,109
Tête enseignante GPT0,355
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle