MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3036922411 · doi:10.7939/r3-cajn-6k31

The Application of Emerging Monitoring Technologies on Very Slow Vegetated Landslides

2020· article· en· W3036922411 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Evan Deane

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueLandslides and related hazards
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLandslideEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Geohazard monitoring is becoming increasingly important alongside increased expectations for the protection of the public. Technological advances in the field of remote monitoring and instrumentation has allowed for an economically efficient means of data collection. Traditional methods of instrumentation have often required expensive, time consuming, and intrusive monitoring methods using permanent instrumentation, such as slope inclinometers and shape-acceleration-arrays. These traditional methods often require site access for large borehole equipment and drilling and installation crews with advanced training. Modern technologies can collect information over large spatial extents, and forms of data which would be impossible or extremely expensive to obtain using traditional methods. In this thesis, the use of differential global positioning systems (GPS), terrestrial light detection and ranging (LiDAR) laser scanning, and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry for improving landslide monitoring is analyzed. The use of these technologies is well proven, but there are technical limitations of these technologies regarding landslide velocity and vegetation. This thesis focuses on investigating these limitations, methods in which these limitations can be overcome, and the knowledge we were able to obtain from application of these technologies to a Very Slow (As defined by Cruden and Varnes 1996), vegetated landslide. This work is performed with the aid of a study site, called the Chin Coulee landslide, in Southern Alberta, Canada. The Chin Coulee landslide is a large deep-seated, Very Slow, vegetated landslide, and provided a challenging testbed for the study of the limitations of these modern technologies. It was found that differential GPS systems work well in slow moving conditions, although short-term, month-to-month data sampling would be inadequate for accurately representing landslide movement. Water conditions in and around the site, including overland erosional flow, internal groundwater flow resulting in seepage along the slope, and in the case of Chin Coulee, the reservoir elevation, are relevant to landslide movement and vary throughout the year. To fully understand landslide movement, it is recommended that at the very least, a full calendar year study be performed, with 2-3 years of study often being more appropriate for fully understanding the mechanisms which lead to instability. As only one year of monitoring was available, it is difficult to identify the true impact events have on landslide stability. Limit equilibrium analysis shows support for reservoir drawdown decreasing landslide stability on Chin Coulee, with up to 8% reduction in factor of safety from 1.06 to 0.98 being observed during a historical critical drawdown scenario. Application of terrestrial LiDAR to slow-moving, vegetated landslides posed several challenges, most notably the detectable limit of movement. During slow moving conditions, without extended monitoring periods, movement will often be under the detectable level of movement, referred to as level of detection (LOD). The required duration between scans depends heavily on site and scanning conditions. Scans performed on highly vegetated sites from long distances will increase the LOD. In the case of Chin Coulee, it was not possible to bring the LOD below 50 – 70 mm. Due to the slow movement rate this LOD necessitated a monitoring window of roughly 12 months. UAV photogrammetry was used for feature tracking of erosional channels and headscarp locations for comparison to historical information collected in 1998. Identification of increased erosion channel growth and headscarp movement was possible. A novel application of photogrammetry was the creation of a 3D model based on air photos collected in 1982 following landslide initiation. Change detection using this 3D model and a current day LiDAR scan was performed to observe the evolution of the landslide over the past 36 years. This helped to support the proposed failure mechanism for the Chin Coulee landslide. UAV-based change detection was performed using two photogrammetry models of Chin Coulee. UAV photogrammetry was limited on Chin Coulee due to the inability of photography to penetrate vegetation. The achievable LOD for this change detection was calculated at roughly 90 mm. UAV photogrammetry-based change detection appeared to show exaggerated movement in some regions, suggesting model inaccuracy. Identification of the limitations of these modern technologies is an important step for adoption into the field of geotechnical engineering. Due to these limitations these technologies are not yet suitable for all conditions and purposes but provide strong monitoring options when viable.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,038
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,076

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,169
Écart entre enseignants0,163 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetLandslides and related hazardsTravaux en français237 207