MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3037137772 · doi:10.1353/his.2019.0079

Global Piracy: A Documentary History of Seaborne Banditry by James E. Wadsworth

2020· article· en· W3037137772 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arne Bialuschewski

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMaritime Security and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThrivingGlossaryHistoryClassicsSociologySocial sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

WADSWORTH, James E. – Global Piracy: A Documentary History of Seaborne Banditry. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. Pp. 328. The study of pirates has generated enormous interest in recent years. Many universities are offering courses on the history of piracy, and the book market seems to be thriving. Getting access to primary sources has proved a challenge, however, and anthologies of previously unpublished material are rare. James Wadsworth, a professor of history at Stonehill College in Massachusetts, has published a new book that promises to provide an outline of global piracy. The author writes that he teaches a first-year course on global piracy, and a lack of available sources prompted him to write this book. His work covers a wide range of topics. There are chapters on ancient piracy in the Mediterranean, the Vikings, Asian piracy at various stages, the seventeenth-century Caribbean, the so-called Golden Age of Piracy, and four of the 16 chapters are on modern-day pirates. This is a truly global coverage of more than two thousand years of seaborne predations. All chapters have a lengthy overview followed by three or four primary sources exclusively transcribed from published works. The book also has a number of useful maps, images, a glossary of terms, suggested questions for discussion in the classroom, and a selected bibliography. Over the years Wadsworth must have amassed considerable expertise on piracy, even though it appears that he has never undertaken any original research in this field. The overviews show that the author does not fall into the trap of romanticizing this form of violent crime, and the selection of primary sources by and large helps to illustrate many characteristics of piracy. The inclusion of various raiders who, judged by legal standards, were not pirates may help to provoke discussions about a workable definition of piracy. The book also overcomes a Eurocentric focus that runs through much of the historiography of early modern piracy. Unfortunately, the treatment of Caribbean piracy—unquestionably the source of most legends and myths—is a bit thin, and the chapter on the infamous buccaneers contains a few errors. The name of these freebooters, for example, is derived from the Tupi-Guarani term mukem, not from the Taino language. The idea that buccaneers seized Spanish vessels, threw the crews overboard, and sailed away, as asserted by Wadsworth, does not reflect the historical reality. Buccaneers were essentially land forces that used watercraft to inflict amphibious warfare on colonial towns in the Spanish empire. These raiding gangs often relied upon support from native groups. This is shown in the description of the 1680 Portobelo raid in this book. However, the source introduction, as well as so many others, is very scant and barely explains the specific historical context of the source. To illustrate the history of the buccaneers, Wadsworth also recites the story of Pierre Le Grand, of whom nothing else is known other than what Alexandre-Olivier Exquemelin wrote in his book on the Americaensche Zee-Roovers, published in 1678. He presumably heard this story in Tortuga in 1666 or 1667. However, this remarkable narrative is full of contradictions and the fact that no corroborating sources seem to survive in the archives should make every historian very cautious. Presenting this text as an example of the problematic nature of so many sources would have been fine, but students should not take this as a typical example of buccaneering activity. Wadsworth’s ambitious book is certainly a valuable contribution to the growing body of pirate publications. The wide scope of the chapters is laudable, and the author handles the many challenges involved reasonably well. Small flaws should not distract readers from gaining valuable insights into one of the most fascinating and intriguing chapters in maritime history. Arne Bialuschewski Trent University ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,069

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0200,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetMaritime Security and HistoryTravaux en français237 207