MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3037541938 · doi:10.11575/prism/37939

Road network vulnerability analysis with consideration of probability and consequences of disruptive events

2020· dissertation· en· W3037541938 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsHong Kong Polytechnic University
Mots-clésVulnerability (computing)Vulnerability assessmentGeographyComputer sciencePsychologyComputer securitySocial psychologyPsychological resilience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To assess the vulnerability of road networks, the commonly used analytical vulnerability analysis is to determine the global vulnerability of links in a road network by removing links one by one from the network and measuring the resulting increase in the total travel cost of the network. Such global vulnerability ranking might fail to identify the most critical links as it overlooks important factors that affect the vulnerability of road links. Instances of such factors include link specific geometry design, poor downstream traffic signal timing, and/or links that are prone to more collisions. Additionally, traditional techniques identify the critical links of a transportation network measuring only the consequences of the link closure with little consideration given to its closure probability. Consideration of the probability of link closure or failure is important as some of the links in a transportation network are more susceptible to disruptive events than others. To fill the void in the literature, I propose two data-driven vulnerability approaches: 1) vulnerability analysis by modeling monthly and seasonal extreme travel delay variations and 2) vulnerability analysis by measuring the spatio-temporal impact of incidents. In studying road network vulnerability by modeling monthly and seasonal variation of extreme travel delay, I propose a new class of extreme value distribution called compound generalized extreme value (CGEV) distribution for depicting the monthly and seasonal variation in extreme travel delays in road networks. Since the frequency and severity of extreme events are highly correlated to the variation in weather conditions as an extrinsic cause of incidents and long delays, monthly and seasonal changes in weather contribute to extreme travel time variability. The change in driving behavior, which itself varies according to road/weather conditions, also contributes to the monthly and seasonal variation in observed extreme travel times. Therefore, it is critical to model the effect of monthly and seasonal changes on observed extreme travel delays on road networks. Based on the empirically revealed linear relationship between mean and standard deviation (SD) of extreme travel delays for both monthly and seasonal levels, I formulated two multiplicative error models. I then obtain the CGEV distribution by linking the two multiplicative error models and formed a compound distribution that characterizes the overall variation in extreme travel delay. I calibrated the CGEV distribution parameters and validated the underlying assumptions that are used to derive the CGEV distribution using multi-year observed travel time data from the City of Calgary road network. The results indicate that accounting for the seasonality by identifying seasonal specific parameters provides a flexible and not too complex CGEV distribution that is shown to outperform the traditional GEV distribution. Finally, I evaluated the application of the proposed CGEV distribution in the context of road network vulnerability taking into account the stochastic nature of extreme event occurrences and the link importance. This derived data-driven vulnerability index incorporates a wealth of information related to both network topology in terms of connectivity and the dynamic interaction between travel demand and supply. In studying road network vulnerability by measuring the spatio-temporal impact of incidents, I propose a new data-driven, impact area, vulnerability analysis approach that takes into consideration both the probability of impact as well as the effects of incidents on the impact area. I employed multi-year observed travel time and incident data to investigate these underlying dynamics as the datasets contain important information that reflect the historical spatial and temporal occurrences of link closure and their network wide impacts. Rather than focusing solely on the travel time fluctuation of the link subject to incident, and to capture all aspects of incidents’ impact, I developed a new approach to identify both the resulting spatial and temporal impacts by monitoring the dynamic propagation and dissemination of congestion patterns in the set of links that are in the vicinity of the link subject to incident (i.e., impact area). I subsequently used these spatial and temporal dimensions of the impacts in the vulnerability analysis. I examined the performance of the developed approach, historical travel time and incident data of the City of Calgary. The results indicate that the recorded temporal impact of incidents is not representative enough of the true impact of incidents since it overlooks the dynamic spatial propagation of the effect of incidents on the impact area. Finally, I used the estimated spatio-temporal impact of incidents in Calgary road network to determine the vulnerability of the links considering both the probability that links in an impact area are affected by an incident as well as the spatio-temporal consequence of the incident on the impact area. This data-driven vulnerability measure could be used as a decision support tool for decision-makers in prioritizing improvements to critical links to enhance overall network vulnerability, reliability, and resilience.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,544
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,762

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle