MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3037939617 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100423

When pandemics clash: Gendered violence-related traumatic brain injuries in women since COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3037939617 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eve M. Valera

Notice bibliographique

RevueEClinicalMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Center for Medical Rehabilitation ResearchDefense and Veterans Brain Injury CenterOffice of Research on Women's HealthNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative MedicineNational Institutes of Health
Mots-clésDomestic violenceMedicineScopusPsychological interventionPoison controlInjury preventionHarmSuicide preventionPsychiatryMedical emergencyMEDLINEPsychologySocial psychologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recent articles highlight reports of escalating rates of domestic violence (DV) in numerous countries including, for example, a 300% increase in police reports of intimate-partner violence (IPV) likely fuelled by effects and mitigation strategies of COVID-19.[1]Peterman A. Potts A. O'Donnell M. et al.Pandemics and violence against women and children.Center Global Dev Work Paper. 2020; 528 (DC: Center for Global Development)Google Scholar Left out of these reports is any mention of a possibly coincident surge in one of IPV's most dangerous yet often overlooked consequences, traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). All clinicians need to be aware of this in order to ensure optimal interventions and avoid additional harm. Approximately one in four women experience severe IPV,[2]Breiding M.J. Chen J. Black M.C Intimate partner violence in the United States — 2010.in: GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta2014Google Scholar with most recorded injuries to the neck and higher,[3]Wu V. Huff H. Bhandari M Pattern of physical injury associated with intimate partner violence in women presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010; 11: 71-82Crossref PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar including frequent high-impact forces to the head.[4]Valera E.M. Kucyi A. Brain injury in women experiencing intimate partner-violence: neural mechanistic evidence of an “invisible” trauma.Brain Imaging Behav. 2017; 11: 1664-1677Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar Data suggest staggeringly high rates of IPV-related TBIs even under “normal” conditions.[4]Valera E.M. Kucyi A. Brain injury in women experiencing intimate partner-violence: neural mechanistic evidence of an “invisible” trauma.Brain Imaging Behav. 2017; 11: 1664-1677Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar, [5]Valera E.M. Berenbaum H. Brain injury in battered women.J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 797-804Crossref PubMed Scopus (122) Google Scholar In COVID-19 conditions, as violence escalates, women who may want to escape may not have the option due to mitigation strategies or contamination fears, likely resulting in more severe forms of abuse including TBIs. IPV-related TBIs have been linked to poorer cognitive, psychological, and neural health.[4]Valera E.M. Kucyi A. Brain injury in women experiencing intimate partner-violence: neural mechanistic evidence of an “invisible” trauma.Brain Imaging Behav. 2017; 11: 1664-1677Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar, [5]Valera E.M. Berenbaum H. Brain injury in battered women.J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 797-804Crossref PubMed Scopus (122) Google Scholar However, women are often unaware they have sustained TBIs or understand the importance of reporting them. Consequently, post-TBI symptoms – such as depression, anxiety, cognitive, or sleep difficulties - may be misinterpreted as psychological responses to the abuse resulting in misdiagnoses, inappropriate treatment, and unsuccessful outcomes. It is every clinician's responsibility to screen for IPV-related TBI. Couching questions in the context of COVID-19 as a risk factor for violence may reduce stigma associated with being abused. Screening can be as simple as inquiring about partner-related hits, jolts or forces to the head that resulted in an alteration or change in consciousness as indicated by a loss of consciousness (even if very brief), disorientation, confusion, memory loss, dizziness, or seeing stars or spots. If IPV-related TBI appears to be likely, referral to a neurologist or concussion specialist should be made. This will provide women with an opportunity to obtain information about sequelae of TBIs, and understand that problems they may have with anxiety, depression, cognition or sleep, may be related to TBIs rather than merely “psychological stress.” We need to inform women of the dangers of IPV-related TBI and offer them resources. The clash of IPV and COVID-19 has created a perfect storm for an increase in this “invisible trauma.” If we do not act now, we risk facing yet another pandemic of women who are struggling to live with the effects of likely undiagnosed TBIs. Dr. Valera reports grants from National Institutes of Health, grants from Rappaport Fellowship, during the conduct of the study; grants from National Institutes of Health, grants from Rappaport Fellowship, outside the submitted work; Dr. Valera reports grants from National Institutes of Health, grants from Rappaport Fellowship, from Canadian Concussion Centre at The Krembil Neuroscience Centre, from Ontario Brain Injury Association, from Oatley Vigmond Law Firm, from Learning Network at the Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children (CREVAWC) and Western University, from Quebec Women's Shelter Association, from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, from Santa Clara Superior Court, from NINDS, CNRM, DVBIC, NCMRR, NICHD, and ORWH, from Institute on Violence, Abuse and Trauma, from The CACTIS Foundation, Sojourner centre, University of Arizona College of Medicine, during the conduct of the study; grants from National Institutes of Health, grants from Rappaport Fellowship, from Canadian Concussion Centre at The Krembil Neuroscience Centre, from Ontario Brain Injury Association, from Oatley Vigmond Law Firm, from Learning Network at the Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children (CREVAWC) and Western University, from Quebec Women's Shelter Association, from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, from Santa Clara Superior Court, from NINDS, CNRM, DVBIC, NCMRR, NICHD, and ORWH, from Institute on Violence, Abuse and Trauma, from The CACTIS Foundation, Sojourner centre, University of Arizona College of Medicine, outside the submitted work; none. None

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,474
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,106
Tête enseignante GPT0,405
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations23
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEClinicalMedicineMême sujetIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceTravaux en français237 207