Notice bibliographique
Résumé
(ProQuest Information and Learning: ... denotes formulae omitted.) SOLAR INCONSTANCY is a subject well suited to the APS, for it bears on material considered by all its classes, not least Class V. Astrophysicists, evolutionary biologists, anatomists, archaeologists, and historians illuminate the problem; but any action arising from their findings is likely to be politically charged, especially when acceptance of solar variability is seen to undermine the case for control of manmade greenhouse gases. And, as Eddy (1976) has observed, it is a question more for social than for physical science why we should think that the Sun, unlike other stars, is perfect, if imperfect then consistent, and if inconsistent then regular in its behaviour. The title of this paper evidently alludes to the solar constant, a measure of the radiant energy impinging upon the top of the Earth's atmosphere. When such a value was first sought, it was perforce measured at the bottom of the atmosphere. In the late nineteenth century S. P. Langley voiced the suspicion that the constant was no such thing, but the matter could not be resolved until the development of space probes and artificial satellites. They revealed various small but measurable variations. My aim is to show that we cannot hope to understand this variability until we extend the Sun's history back well beyond the few years spanned by instrumental observations. To the astrophysicist even an imperfect chronicle of solar variability is useful, as it bears on the Sun's dynamics, internal structure, and magnetic activity, and thus on stellar evolution in general (Weiss 1980). It is a twoway street: without information furnished by other stars there would be no main sequence for the Sun to inhabit, and there are numerous variable stars which display periodic fluctuations in luminosity that, as in the Sun, appear to reflect differential rotation and fluctuating levels of activity. The same applies to space exploration, where, even if the prediction of solar weather is in its infancy, a knowledge of the potential hazards is essential to sensible planning. Skylab was forced down in 1979 by increased drag resulting from heating and expansion of gases in the Earth's upper atmosphere associated with solar turbulence, as was the Solar Maximum Mission in 1989. Flares and coronal mass ejections create magnetic storms that may lead to radio blackouts and widespread computer failure, as in the Toronto stock exchange in 1989, and the associated radiation especially in the X-ray range endangers astronauts and also airline passengers on polar routes. Such solar storms tend to be most numerous when the 11-year solar cycle discussed below nears its peak, but the violent flares of October 2003, near solar minimum (Lopez et al. 2004), show that the assumption is fragile. On Earth it is the UV portion of the solar spectrum (100-400 nm) that offers the greatest threat to human health. UVB radiation (280-315 nm), which makes up a mere 1% of the total, can result in skin cancers and other chronic skin changes, the suppression of immune responses, and cancer of the conjunctiva and cataracts (WHO 1994). Direct damage to proteins can occur at wavelengths within the UVA range (315-400 nm). The ozone layer blocks all UVC (100-280 nm) and 90% of UVB radiation from reaching the Earth's surface, although any such effect varies from place to place and is subject to seasonal fluctuations as well as any change in the integrity of the ozone shield. One estimate puts the consequence of a 10% decrease in stratospheric ozone at a worldwide increase of cataract cases by 1.6 million. The contribution of solar variability to climatic change, the most self-evident-or at any rate topical-motive for pursuing the subject, remains curiously unclear. Part of the blame must lie with the widespread reliance on the matching of time-series even when the causal link is not self-evident; witness the enthusiasm that greeted the demonstration by Friis-Christensen and Lassen (1991) that temperature anomalies in the Northern Hemisphere since 1860 had fluctuated in sympathy with variations in the length of the sunspot cycle. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».