EMPOWERING RURAL WOMEN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES: CASE OF MIGWANI SUB-COUNTY, KITUI COUNTY, KENYA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the link between the empowerment of rural women and sustainable development. Women account for about half of the world’s population. However, despite decades of development and a push for democracy and good governance globally, women still remain among vulnerable groups in the world living in abject poverty and lacking access and control over resources. For instance, even though women constitute the majority in food production, only 20% of them own arable land globally. Even with the high population, their participation in public leadership, decisions and policymaking largely remains extremely skewed towards men. For that reason, some international agencies have strongly addressed themselves to the plight of women, working towards more gender equity. Thus, the only assured pathway to development sustainability is to ensure consideration of both women's and men’s voices and interests as well as having parity in the allocation of resources and opportunities. This paper entails a descriptive study whose data was collected from 100 respondents using a questionnaire. Both women and men were sampled to avoid any biases. The study findings indicated that; women were the majority in the informal sector with 86% compared to men who accounted for only 14%. However, despite their heavy presence in the sector, their educational status was very low with only 78.2% having attained primary school education, whereas the men had higher educational achievement with 76.9% having attained a secondary school education. In spite of the traditional strategies of empowerment adopted by the government and the private sector, the study established that women had their preferred strategies to empower themselves. For example, they valued the availability of saving cooperatives (95.4%); having a safe working environment for their business (95.4%); getting family support in doing business (91.5%); equitable access to relevant and timely information (95.4%); having facilities like table banking (95.4%); having training on decision-making (91.5%) and having access to credit facilities (90.8%). Therefore, the involvement of women in policy and decision-making on issues of their empowerment is critical in order to adopt and implement their voices and interests. Without women’s involvement and engagement, the realization of sustainable development cannot be attained.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».