Analysis Of Test Battery For Elite Ice Hockey Players
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: The purpose was to conduct a test battery on elite ice-hockey players to better understand the relationships between the different assessments. METHODS: Subject’s (n=41) physical characteristics were measured prior to testing session. Countermovement Jump (CMJ) height was estimated with a Bosco mat. Stationary Broad Jump (BJ) distance was measured from toes (starting line) to the closest heel. The best of 2 completed attempts was retained for both jump tests. On-ice repeated sprints’ time was measured with photo cells timing gates (TCi Smart Start, Brower Timing System, Utah, USA). Protocol consisted of 9 sprints of 40 m with 3 seconds of recovery between sprints that permitted subjects to turn around and return to the finish line which now became the starting line for the next sprint. Heart rate was measured with a heart rate (HR) monitor (RS400, Polar, FI). Local muscle oxygenation (SmO2) was measured on vastus lateralis with a muscle oxygen monitor (MOXY, Minnesota, USA). Blood lactate ([La+]) was measured with a lactate analyzer (Lactate Pro, Akray, Japan). Rated Perceived Exertion (RPE) was measured with a Borg Scale (6-20). Correlations were calculated (SPSS Ver 25) using a 2-tailed Pearson correlation analysis. Significance was set at p<0.05. Subjects characteristics are presented as means and standard deviations. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: Multiple significant (p<0.05) relationships were observed (r=-0.47-0.81). Findings show that age (r=-0.53-0.51), years of experience in resistance training (r=-0.32-0.48), weight (r=-0.33-0.47) and lean body mass (-0.38-0.46) were significantly correlated with jump and on ice sprint performance (Speed, Time, [La+] and RPE). The CMJ seems to be more important than the BJ for on ice sprint performance (r=-0.53-0.40 vs -0.19-0.28). Maximal HR is significantly correlated with fatigue index (r=0.41). The Borg scale seems to be a good tool to see if hockey players gave a maximal effort as it presents multiple significant correlations with sprint performance (r=-0.37-0.34). SmO2 was significantly correlated with [La+] (r=-0.35). CONCLUSION: Results of the present study should be utilised by ice-hockey strength and conditioning coaches to improve their testing battery. Further research should include resistance training exercises in their analysis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».