MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3041143719

Establishing a Framework for the Peaceful Enjoyment of the Traditional Territories of First Nations in Northeast British Columbia

2020· dissertation· en· W3041143719 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abigael Rice

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeographyPolitical scienceEthnologyHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

With the 1899 signing of Treaty 8, the Dene-zaa of northeast British Columbia were assured that their usual vocations of hunting, trapping and fishing would not be affected by European settlement, and they would be as free after signing the treaty as they were prior to it. Yet, after a century of failed promises, the Dene-zaa have been forced to watch much of their traditional territories transformed to meet the economic interests of industry and government. Today, the Dene-zaa are once again trying to protect their lands, and their relationships with them. Their efforts involve participating in the Regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (RSEA) for northeast British Columbia. Through the RSEA process they have introduced the concept of Peaceful Enjoyment as a guiding principle for evaluating and mitigating potential impacts stemming from energy development. For the Dene-zaa, Peaceful Enjoyment encapsulates a preferred way of life and may represent their last remaining opportunity to protect their physical and spiritual connection to the land.\nIn collaboration with the West Moberly First Nations, Saulteau First Nations, and the RSEA Management Committee, my research set out to document the extent to which First Nation livelihoods are derived from environmental resources and the conditions required for the attainment of Peaceful Enjoyment of traditional lands. More specifically, the objectives of my research were to: 1) Quantify the total edible food weight and number of wildlife species harvested by First Nation members over a 12-month period (2016-2017); 2) Quantify the extent to which traditional foods are shared between First Nation households; 3) Map harvest areas by food weight, species, and community use; 4) Identify areas within the West Moberly and Saulteau First Nations traditional territories where land use has been constrained, whether due to industrial development, competing land uses, or other social or ecological constraints; and 5) Explore changes in the landscape that First Nations members have experienced throughout their lifetime. \nMy research utilized a mix-methodology involving archival research, participant observation, key informant interviews, household surveys, land use mapping, social network analysis, and spatial modeling. The results demonstrate that the harvest and subsequent sharing of traditional foods make an important contribution to the cultural, economic, and nutritional well-being of First Nations members. During the survey period, SFN households alone harvested an estimated 56,027 kg of traditional foods. This includes 31,176 kg of moose, 22,194 kg of other large mammals, 1,307 kg of small mammals, 1,164 kg of fish and 186 kg of birds. 79.3% of this harvest occurred within a 100 km radius of the SFN community, but also extended as far as 100 km to the northwest. These foods were then shared through 244 individual exchanges involving 160 households, 74 of which were located in 13 other communities. However, my results also show that the opportunities for First Nation members to experience the Peaceful Enjoyment of their traditional lands is constrained by physical disturbances associated with resource development, competition with non-First Nation hunters and recreationalists, and a range of social and economic barriers. These results, if accounted for in the planning and assessment process, can assist the RSEA Management Committee in making informed decisions regarding the cultural impacts stemming from future energy development in northeast British Columbia.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,795
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207