Does manuka honey improve the speed of wound healingin dogs?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Henry, a two-year-old Labrador retriever, has been involved in a road traffic accident in which he partially degloved his distal right forelimb. You think you can repair some of the damage with surgery, but know that some areas will have to heal by secondary intention. You've recently been on a continuing professional development course about wounds that recommended applying manuka honey to aid wound healing. You wonder whether adding medical-grade manuka honey to your usual dressing protocol would improve the rate of healing. In [dogs with acute superficial wounds] does using [a dressing plus medical-grade manuka honey versus a dressing alone] result in [more rapid wound healing]? The search terms (dog.mp. OR dogs.mp. OR canine.mp. OR canines.mp. OR Canis.mp. OR exp Dogs/) AND (wound.mp. OR wounds.mp. OR (wounds and injuries).mp. OR abrasion.mp. OR abrasions.mp. OR laceration.mp. OR lacerations.mp. OR lesion.mp. OR lesions.mp. OR exp Wounds and Injuries/ OR exp Lacerations/) AND (honey.mp. OR Manuka.mp. OR Medihoney.mp. OR Activon.mp. OR exp Honey/) were used in a Medline search, using the Ovid interface. In addition, the search terms (dog.mp. OR dogs.mp. OR canine.mp. OR canines.mp. OR Canis.mp. OR exp Dogs/ OR exp Canis/) AND (wound.mp. OR wounds.mp. OR (wounds and injuries).mp. OR abrasion.mp. OR abrasions.mp. OR laceration.mp. OR lacerations.mp. OR lesion.mp. OR lesions.mp. OR exp wounds/ OR exp injuries/ OR exp abrasion/ OR exp lesions/) AND (honey.mp. OR Manuka.mp. OR Medihoney.mp. OR Activon.mp. OR exp honey/) were used in a CAB Abstracts search, also using the Ovid interface. Seven papers were found in the Medline search. Search last performed: 28 May 2020 No evidence base was found to answer this question. All papers returned by the search were excluded because they either did not directly compare dressings with honey to dressings alone, were related to in vitro and experimental research or were narrative review articles or conference proceedings. The search strategy used in this evidence evaluation was not designed to include wounds resulting from burns. A search with terms relating to burns would, therefore, need to be carried out to address the role of manuka honey in burn wound healing. This evidence evaluation highlights that there is a pressing need for further research to directly compare the success rates of the different wound management approaches. Although there were publications found that described the use of honey in wound management, these were primarily case reports – and therefore couldn't answer the comparative component of our question – or opinion pieces. Narrative reviews and expert opinion pieces, along with other sources such as textbooks and reputable online resources, can be used when deciding which approach to employ when no peer-reviewed evidence exists. However, an awareness of the strengths and limitations of all of these evidence sources in relation to decision making is important. Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) are a standardised, succinct summary of research evidence organised around a clinical question, and a form of evidence synthesis used in the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). Access to CATs enables clinicians to incorporate evidence from the scientific literature into clinical practice. CATs will be published regularly in the Clinical Decision Making section of Vet Record.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».