Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocker in coronavirus disease 2019: Safe and possibly beneficial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sir, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a mild disease in most patients. However, initial reports suggest that hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases are common comorbidities in such patients, and mortality tended to be high.[1] Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, heart failure, and postmyocardial infarction. The apprehension of nephrologists, cardiologists, and all physicians on the use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs in the population who are at risk of COVID-19 is valid. ACE and ACE2, both belonging to dipeptidyl carboxypeptidases family, have different physiological functions. ACE catalyzes angiotensin I to angiotensin II, which binds to angiotensin receptor II type 1 receptor (ATR1). ACE inhibitors block ACE and ARBs block ATR1. ACE2 is predominantly present on the epithelial cells of the lung, kidney, heart, intestine, and blood vessels. ACE2 majorly catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7, and its minor action is on conversion of angiotensin 1 to angiotensin 1–9. ACE2 exists in two forms: (1) structural transmembrane protein with extracellular domain which binds to spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and (2) the soluble form that represents the circulating ACE2 which catalyzes angiotensin II and I. ACE2 physiologically encounters renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and exerts its vasodilatory effects on the cardiovascular system by deactivating angiotensin II.[2] Association of coronavirus action with the renin angiotensin system pathway has been streamlined in Figure 1. The SARS-CoV-2 virus enters the cell through ACE2 receptor on the lung membrane. After entry inside the cell, SARS-CoV-2 virus proliferates, replicates, and causes downregulation of ACE2. Downregulation of ACE2 level leads to upsurge in angiotensin II level in the vascular system, causing vasoconstriction, acute lung injury, myocardial injury, renal vasoconstriction, and increase renin level. Increase renin level further potentiates RAAS pathway and this cascade continues.[3]Figure 1: RAAS and COVID-19 cascade. The SARS-Cov-2 virus enters the lung through ACE 2, replicates, and further downregulates the ACE 2 enzyme (dotted line). The physiological function of ACE 2 is to degrade angiotensin II into angiotensin 1-7. Downregulation of the ACE 2 enzyme by virus leads to an increase in Angiotensin II, which causes systemic injury. The upregulation of RAAS pathway is a hypothesis in SARS-Cov-2 injury. ACEi block ACE enzyme and ARBs block ATR1 thereby potentially blocking this upregulated pathway. RAAS (renin angiotensin aldosterone system) SARS-Cov-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome- Coronavirus 2), ACE2 (soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme2), ACEi (Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), ARBs (angiotensin receptors blockers), ATR1 (angiotensin II receptors)ACE and ACE2 are structural homologs with different physiological functions as described earlier. ACE inhibitors act on ACE, and its effect on ACE2 remains controversial. The role of ACE2 in contributing to the cardioprotective effect of angiotensin 1–7 was demonstrated by Loot et al.,[4] who showed that long-term infusions of angiotensin 1–7 reversed cardiac dysfunction in animals after myocardial infarction. In addition, Ferrario et al. showed that the ACE inhibitors/ARBs increased cardiac ACE2 gene expression and cardiac ACE2 activity.[56] Contrary to it, recent animal studies showed no effect of ACE inhibitors/ARBs over cardiac ACE2 activity.[7] Likewise, human studies of ACE inhibitors/ARBs have shown conflicting results. ACE2 is always a molecule of research for heart failure from two decades. Increased levels of soluble ACE2 have been observed in heart failure and myocardial infarction.[8] Increased urinary ACE2 levels by olmesartan has revealed additional renoprotective effect of olmesartan in a longitudinal cohort study.[9] On the contrary, some studies have shown no relation of ACE inhibitors with ACE2 levels.[10] There is a complex relationship between SARS-CoV-2 virus and ACE inhibitors/ARBs. Theoretically, upregulation of ACE2 level by ACE inhibitors/ARBs aids the entry of virus inside cell and potentially exacerbates injury.[11] In this COVID-19 pandemic, the recent study by Liu et al.[12] showed that angiotensin II levels were higher and linearly associated with viral load and lung injury in COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Conversely, ACE inhibitors/ARBs inhibit production and attachment of angiotensin II, prevent vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II, and might be beneficial in these patients. The COVID-19 and RAAS cascade have been discussed in various large platforms, and to lessen the confusion, American, European, and Canadian guidelines on hypertension and heart failure discourage the discontinuation of ACE inhibitors/ARBs in the population already on these drugs.[13] The biological plausibility of ACE inhibitors/ARBs with COVID-19 is controversial and unproven. Sudden discontinuation of ACE inhibitors/ARBs in the population already on these drugs would precipitate heart failure and can cause rebound hypertension, thereby leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, the key learning point is to continue these drugs till further evidence. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».