2020 Brina C. Kessel Award to Corey Tarwater, Ryan Germain, and Peter Arcese
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Corey Tarwater Every 2 years, the American Ornithological Society bestows the Brina C. Kessel Award for a paper published during the preceding 2 yr in The Auk: Ornithological Advances that has made an exceptional contribution to ornithology. The Kessel Award for 2020 is presented to Corey Tarwater, Ryan Germain, and Peter Arcese for their paper, “Examination of context-dependent effects of natal traits on lifetime reproductive success using a long-term study of a temperate songbird,” published in 2018. The Mandarte Island population of Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia), first studied by Frank Tompa and later by Jamie N. M. Smith and then Peter Arcese, has made countless contributions to ornithology, ecology, behavior, and evolutionary biology. It represents one of the finest, if not the finest, long-term study of a single population of birds in North America. The present contribution by Tarwater et al., based on nearly 4 decades of information on individual probability of surviving to breed and lifetime reproductive success of a fully marked population, showed that survival and lifetime reproductive success were heavily affected by a suite of natal characters, but that maternal age and inbreeding coefficient affected both traits. Population density, which can vary tremendously from year to year at this site, interacted with inbreeding such that negative effects of inbreeding were more apparent in years of low population density. Low individual lifetime reproductive success was associated with being relatively inbred, raised by a young mother, hatching late in the season, and low body condition just prior to fledging. Fundamental and possibly most important was the conclusion that natal traits had life-long influences on fitness, and that with the exception of effects of inbreeding, the effects of other natal traits were insensitive to variation in population density. Ryan Germain Peter Arcese This year, the AOS Publications Awards Committee felt that 3 additional papers deserved recognition as runners-up for the Kessel Award: “Sex differences in migratory restlessness behavior in a Nearctic–Neotropical songbird” by J. E. Deakin, C. G. Guglielmo, and Y. E. Morbey; “Vision in an abundant North American bird: The Red-winged Blackbird” by E. Fernandez-Juricic, P. E. Baumhardt, L. P. Tyrrell, A. Elmore, S. T. DeLiberto, and S. J. Werner; and “The evolution of vocal duets and migration in New World warblers (Parulidae)” by L. R. Mitchell, L. Benedict, J. Cavar, N. Najar, and D. M. Logue, all published in The Auk: Ornithological Advances in 2019. Given in even-numbered years and consisting of a cash prize of $1,000, the Kessel Award is given in honor of Brina Kessel, former President of the AOU (1992–1994) and beloved leader and mentor in ornithology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».