Inhabiting the In-Between: Childhood and Cinema in Spain’s Long Transition by Sarah Thomas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Inhabiting the In-Between: Childhood and Cinema in Spain’s Long Transition by Sarah Thomas John Margenot Thomas, Sarah. Inhabiting the In-Between: Childhood and Cinema in Spain’s Long Transition. U of Toronto P, 2019. Pp. 240. ISBN 978-1-48750-488-5. Thomas’s insightful monograph, Inhabiting the In-Between: Childhood and Cinema in Spain’s Long Transition, probes the portrayal of the multivalenced, ambivalent and ambiguous child in emblematic films produced by four Spanish filmmakers—Carlos Saura, Antonio Mercero, Víctor Erice and Jaime de Armiñán—during the Long Transition to democracy. Her main thesis is that the cinematic child from this historical period is a fundamentally oscillating figure whose presentation yields multiple readings of history, temporality and the subject. She seeks to expand the critical dialogue surrounding these films across several fields of inquiry—film and media studies, queer studies and Latin American studies, among others—to generate new scholarly debate regarding both the cultural legacy of the Transition and, more broadly, to foment theoretical discourse on the representation of children in cinema. While acknowledging traditional allegorical interpretations of these films (i.e., the child who, like Spain, “comes of age”), Thomas instead builds on work by Lebeau, Lury, Wilson and especially Sarah Wright’s The Child in Spanish Cinema, taking care to eschew a chronological focus in favor of close readings which cast new light on iconic works by Saura and Erice as well as less scrutinized films by Mercero and Armiñán. She argues from various critical perspectives that these films present different types of “in-between” within a socio-political milieu characterized by transition, uncertainty and change. The monograph consists of an introduction, four chapters, each one dedicated to an in-depth analysis of two films by the same director, and a short coda on Carla Simón’s film Estiu 1993 and Saura’s Cría cuervos. Thomas interpolates black and white photographs of cinematic scenes throughout her study, which further enhances her analysis. She also provides English translations in the appropriate register for readers unfamiliar with Castilian. The opening chapter centers on two Saura films from the 1970s: El jardín de las delicias and La prima Angélica, both of which reveal an intense interest in the in-between world of childhood. Thomas’s interpretation draws principally from the political geographer Edward Soja’s theory on thirdspace, Kathryn Bond Stockton’s views on lateral contact—“growing sideways”—between adult and child, as well as trauma theory. She fruitfully explores how each film portrays a former child filtered by adult memory and fantasy amid the temporal dissonance between the present and a personally and politically traumatic past. Chapter 2 turns to two mainstream works from the cine de reforma by Antonio Mercero: La guerra de papá and Tobi, el niño con alas. Thomas bases her critical model on several thinkers— Anne Higonnet, Sally Faulkner and Phillippe Ariès—who discuss from various perspectives the cultural conception of the child’s body. She argues that Mercero’s two films stress the ways the child cannot comprehend the actions or motivations of adults around her/him, particularly regarding sexuality, death and the political sphere. More specifically, Thomas focuses on the presentations of the child as subject and object, as human and non-human, and concludes that Mercero’s cinematic representation of the child figure is the product of anxieties regarding the past and future during the Long Transition to democracy. Of special interest is the discussion on how the director’s use of mimicry has political implications: the child’s mechanical repetition of the adult character’s language serves as a critique of the “grown-up” world of Francoist Spain and the persistent shadow of the Civil War. In Chapter 3 Thomas turns her attention to the oscillation dynamic of empathetic identification central to Víctor Erice’s vision of the child in his El espíritu de la colmena and El sur. Drawing [End Page 293] on theorists of cinema ethics—Judith Butler, Lisa Cartwright, Vicky Lebeau, Emma Wilson, among others—Thomas posits that Erice employs cinematic techniques of proximity and distance to portray child characters who learn...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».