MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3043572722 · doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.07.022

Extensive pigmented abdominal plaque in a diabetic patient

2020· article· en· W3043572722 sur OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Mourad, Ronald J. Sigal, Richard M. Haber

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAD Case Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHyperkeratosisAcanthosisPapillary dermisDermatologyPapillomatosisSkin biopsyAcanthosis nigricansPathologyAbdomenBiopsyDermisSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 42-year-old man of South-Asian descent with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus presented with a 2-year history of an asymptomatic hyperpigmented plaque on his lower abdomen. He described a 10-year regimen of self-injecting insulin aspart, 60 U, and insulin detemir, 120 U, subcutaneously, twice daily to his lower abdominal area exclusively without rotating areas of injections. Clinical examination found an extensive diffuse hyperpigmented and hyperkeratotic dark-brown corrugated plaque on his lower abdomen (Fig 1). A skin biopsy from the abdominal plaque found epidermal hyperplasia and mild hyperkeratosis (Fig 2). Question 1. Considering the above clinical and histopathologic images, what is the most likely diagnosis?A.Acquired ichthyosisB.Retention hyperkeratosisC.Confluent and reticulated papillomatosis (CARP)D.Drug-induced acanthosis nigricans (AN)E.Erythrasma Answers:A.Acquired ichthyosis – Incorrect. Acquired ichthyosis is associated with conditions such as lymphoma, HIV, inflammatory disorders, and malnutrition. The histology consists of mild orthokeratosis, hyperkeratosis with a diminished granular layer, and negative staining for filaggrin.B.Retention hyperkeratosis – Incorrect. This condition occurs with abnormal desquamation and is typically associated with poor hygiene. Retention hyperkeratosis can usually be removed with an alcohol swab.C.CARP – Incorrect. The typical onset of CARP occurs during pubertal development with lesions manifesting as brown verrucous coalescing papules with a reticulated appearance at the peripheral margins. A classic histopathologic feature is bulbous epidermal rete ridges that protrude into the papillary dermis, which is not supported by the skin biopsy taken.D.Drug-induced AN – Correct. Typically, AN presents as thick hyperpigmented verrucous/velvety plaques commonly over the neck and axillae and is associated with diabetes and obesity. The features of AN on histopathology include hyperkeratosis, dermal papillomatosis, and mild acanthosis.1Pal R. Bhattacharjee R. Chatterjee D. Bhadada S.K. Bhansali A. Dutta P. Exogenous insulin-induced localized acanthosis nigricans: a rare injection site complication.Can J Diabetes. 2020; 44: 219-221Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar,2Yahagi E. Mabuchi T. Nuruki H. et al.Case of exogenous insulin-derived acanthosis nigricans caused by insulin injections.Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2014; 39: 5-9PubMed Google Scholar In this case, the AN was induced by injected insulin.E.Erythrasma – Incorrect. Erythrasma typically presents as brown-to-erythematous plaques and is more prevalent in diabetic patients. It is caused by Corynebacterium minutissimum. Erythrasma often occurs in intertriginous areas and fluoresces a coral-pink color on Wood's lamp examination. Histology shows a sparse superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltration and orthokeratosis within which blue staining organisms (rods and filaments) may be seen on hematoxylin-eosin staining. Question 2. Which of the following contributes to the pathogenesis of drug-induced AN?A.Induction by insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)B.Inflammation secondary to Malassezia furfurC.Genetic predispositionD.Underlying malignancyE.Impairment of the barrier skin function Answers:A.Induction by insulin and IGF – Correct. The pathogenesis of AN, when benign, is likely related to the induction of insulin and IGF, which stimulates the proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts.2Yahagi E. Mabuchi T. Nuruki H. et al.Case of exogenous insulin-derived acanthosis nigricans caused by insulin injections.Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2014; 39: 5-9PubMed Google Scholar Compensatory hyperinsulinemia secondary to insulin resistance (from type 2 diabetes) is a pathogenic factor that is considered to drive this condition. It is believed that long-term exogenous insulin injections to the subcutaneous tissue stimulates epidermal cell growth, leading to the development of AN over these injected areas.3Brodell Jr., J.D. Cannella J.D. Helms S.E. Case report: acanthosis nigricans resulting from repetitive same-site insulin injections.J Drugs Dermatol. 2012; 11: e85-e87PubMed Google Scholar,4Higgins S.P. Freemark M. Prose N.S. Acanthosis nigricans: a practical approach to evaluation and management.Dermatol Online J. 2008; 14: 2Crossref PubMed Google ScholarB.Inflammation secondary to M furfur – Incorrect. Fungal organisms do not contribute to the development of this condition.C.Genetic predisposition – Incorrect. There is no clear evidence suggesting genetic predisposition plays a contributing role in drug-induced AN, which is in contrast to hereditary benign AN that can manifest in an autosomal dominant fashion.D.Underlying malignancy – Incorrect. Benign insulin-induced AN is not related to more worrisome variants of AN, which are often associated with aggressive malignancies.E.Impairment of the barrier skin function – Incorrect. This is not considered to contribute to drug-induced AN development. Question 3. Other than insulin, which of the following medications is most likely to cause a drug-induced AN?A.MethotrexateB.Fusidic acid ointmentC.VancomycinD.TestosteroneE.Nicotinic acid Answers:A.Methotrexate – Incorrect. This medication has not been reported to cause AN.B.Fusidic acid ointment – Incorrect. Fusidic acid is a bacteriostatic antibiotic that inhibits translocation in protein synthesis and is effective in treating gram-positive bacteria especially Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Although this medication has been reported in one case to cause AN from topical application, it is not the most likely to cause drug-induced AN.C.Vancomycin – Incorrect. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of vancomycin-induced AN.D.Testosterone – Incorrect. There have been a few cases of testosterone-induced AN, although this is not a common side effect of this medication.E.Nicotinic acid – Correct. It is estimated that as many as 20% of patients on oral nicotinic acid will have drug-induced AN at some point.5Pedro S. Letter: drug-induced acanthosis nigricans.N Engl J Med. 1974; 291: 422Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,220
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,499

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAAD Case ReportsMême sujetSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchTravaux en français237 207