COVID-19-related deaths in long-term care: The moral failure to care and prepare
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has taken a particularly heavy toll on long-term care (LTC) home residents in Western countries.Almost 80% of Canada's 1 and 50% of Switzerland's 2 coronavirus-related deaths are linked to LTC facilities even under hermetically closed lockdown conditions.Half of the COVID-19-related deaths in Europe 3,4 and 35% of the US death toll 5 are happening in LTC facilities.Although demographical and epidemiological factors like old age and comorbidities have been proposed to explain the excess mortality of this especially vulnerable population, 6 it has become more and more evident that it is not only the vulnerability of individuals but also the place of care that is the major contributing factor capable of explaining this dramatic phenomenon.The failure to plan adequately in this sector, while acute and critical settings received most of the pandemic planning attention, is a reflection of the longstanding low visibility of these care environments.As the unsettling stories of neglect and undignified deaths in LTC facilities continue to unfold, the problem of how we treat older adults, people with disabilities, and those who care for them has been laid bare by the pandemic.The inability of LTC to cope with the devastating impact of COVID-19 within its institutions comes as no surprise.It is a result of the deep-rooted devaluation of care work that happens at the intersection of ageism, ableism, sexism, and racism and is further aggravated by a rude marketization of this healthcare sector.When human value is mainly tied to economic contribution, old and disabled bodies are perceived to have outlived their usefulness and, thus, are undervalued.Contributions that older and disabled adults have made throughout their lives and continue to make to their families, communities, and society and their past work are often unrecognized.Fragility and dependency are negatively perceived as a burden.Thus, provision of care for this group of individuals is not considered a priority, and they are often left in insecure and vulnerable positions.The perception of care work as trivial or of less importance has also contributed to the current crisis in LTC during the pandemic.Care work is not considered a fundamental component of growth and development under neoliberal capitalist ideologies ruling healthcare markets.The existing attitude toward care work is that this work is "low-skilled" by nature and, therefore, a type of work that anyone can do.Women, particularly women of color, have been disproportionately overrepresented in this sector.7 Care workers, the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,022 | 0,065 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,018 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».