MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3045611769

Climate Congress 2019: Global warming and the role of exogenous shocks in enhancing international cooperation: Are we there yet- Anna Malova- University of Glasgow, Scotland

2020· article· en· W3045611769 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Malova

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Coastal Zone Management · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueClimate Change Policy and Economics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDamagesProcrastinationClimate changeNatural disasterGlobal warmingEconomicsPolitical sciencePsychologySocial psychologyLawMeteorologyEcology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There are several well-established facts in the literature on climate change. First, is that international agreement are not able to sustain high levels of participation and deep emission cuts at the same time. Second, with appropriate use of sticks and carrots, they are. Third, that by deterring non-participation, we deter non-compliance as well. Fourth, from the story of the Montreal Protocol it follows that when necessary, countries can cooperate on the Pareto-efficient outcome of the underlying game. Lastly, climate change poses an existential threat to humanity and we do not have much time left to stop. Now, we nonetheless observe suboptimal levels of individual abatement and modest levels of cooperation. Thus, the purpose of this study is to establish the role of unilateral actions in the solution of the collective problem of climate change and to investigate whether external shocks can increase international cooperation. Using game-theoretic approach a model was built which incorporates uncertainty in the form of damages from the natural disasters that have a certain probability of occurring and can be altered by the levels of players’ abatement. There are three major findings: (1) No IEA will be stable unless it requires unilaterally chosen levels of abatement; (2) time-inconsistent players tend to procrastinate, but under certain values of parameters can turn into timeconsistent due to higher perceived probability of future damages; and (3) time-consistent players can, on the contrary, become time-inconsistent and deviate from transition to business-as-usual over time. External shocks will have no effect on the chosen abatement levels unless politicians exhibit some form of statistical biases when estimating the probability of future damages. To increase global abatement, it is necessary that countries unilaterally set more ambitious targets. Otherwise free riding and non-compliance are unavoidable. A dangerous atmospheric devation happens when carbon dioxide (CO2) and other air toxins and ozone harming substances gather in the environment and retain daylight and sunlight based radiation that have bobbed off the world's surface. Ordinarily, this radiation would escape into space—however these toxins, which can keep going for quite a long time to hundreds of years in the air, trap the warmth and cause the planet to get more sultry. That is what's known as the nursery impact. In the United States, the consuming of non-renewable energy sources to make power is the biggest wellspring of warmth catching contamination, creating around two billion tons of CO2 consistently. Coal-consuming force plants are by a wide margin the greatest polluters. The nation's second-biggest wellspring of carbon contamination is the transportation part, which creates about 1.7 billion tons of CO2 emanations a year Curbing risky environmental change requires profound cuts in discharges, just as the utilization of options in contrast to non-renewable energy sources around the world. Fortunately we've begun a turnaround: CO2 emanations in the United States really diminished from 2005 to 2014, thanks to some extent to new, vitality effective innovation and the utilization of cleaner energizes. What's more, researchers keep on growing better approaches to modernize power plants, produce cleaner power, and consume less gas while we drive. The test is to be certain these arrangements are put to utilize and generally embraced. Researchers concur that the world's rising temperatures are energizing longer and more sultry warmth waves, progressively visit dry seasons, heavier precipitation, and all the more remarkable typhoons. In 2015, for instance, researchers said that a continuous dry spell in California—the state's most noticeably awful water lack in 1,200 years—had been strengthened by 15 percent to 20 percent by a dangerous atmospheric devation. They additionally said the chances of comparative dry seasons occurring later on had generally multiplied over the previous century. Also, in 2016, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine declared that it's presently conceivable to unhesitatingly quality certain climate occasions, similar to some warmth waves, legitimately to environmental change. The world's sea temperatures are getting hotter, as well—which implies that hurricanes can get more vitality. So a worldwide temperature alteration could turn, say, a classification 3 tempest into a progressively hazardous class 4 tempest. Truth be told, researchers have discovered that the recurrence of North Atlantic tropical storms has expanded since the mid 1980s, just as the quantity of tempests that arrive at classifications 4 and 5. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina—the costliest tropical storm in U.S. history—struck New Orleans; the second-costliest, Hurricane Sandy, hit the East Coast in 2012. The effects of a dangerous atmospheric devation are being felt over the globe. Extraordinary warmth waves have caused a huge number of passings around the globe as of late. What's more, in a disturbing indication of occasions to come, Antarctica has been losing around 134 billion metric huge amounts of ice every year since 2002. This rate could accelerate on the off chance that we continue consuming non-renewable energy sources at our ebb and flow pace, a few specialists state, causing ocean levels to rise a few meters throughout the following 50 to 150 years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,320
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,333

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Coastal Zone ManagementMême sujetClimate Change Policy and EconomicsTravaux en français237 207