MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3046489807 · doi:10.1353/gss.2020.0018

Plan Colombia: U.S. Ally Atrocities and Community Activism by John Lindsay-Poland

2020· article· en· W3046489807 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John W. Sherman

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of global south studies · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueConflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMilitarismPolitical scienceLawPeace treatySociologyCriminologyPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Plan Colombia: U.S. Ally Atrocities and Community Activism by John Lindsay-Poland John W. Sherman Lindsay-Poland, John. Plan Colombia: U.S. Ally Atrocities and Community Activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2018. Some of the most important and insightful books about the decades-long violence in Colombia have been written by human rights activists—Steven Dudley's Walking Ghosts, Robin Kirk's More Terrible than Death, and Winifred Tate's [End Page 161] Counting the Dead among them. Many of these activists-turned-authors served with accompaniment-oriented organizations, like Peace Brigades International, which placed (mostly) First World volunteers alongside Colombians facing death threats. The purpose of this exercise was not direct deterrence—activists were not bodyguards and did not physically protect their charges, and hence they did not die with them. But they did invariably befriend future victims of violence, and occasionally witnessed murder firsthand. They also became well-informed sources on localized conditions and specific acts of violence, giving us a window, albeit a very narrow one, into on-the-ground conditions in Colombia's protracted conflict. In contrast, few academics ventured into the war zones. John Lindsay-Poland is a vintage activist-author, having opposed US policies in Central America in the 1980s, and US militarism in general, in a non-violent peace tradition, mainly through the Fellowship of Reconciliation. Fortunately, his Plan Colombia book avoids a micro-focus, devoting only about one-fifth of its material to a February 2005 mini-massacre, and its subsequent cover-up, in the Urabá region of northwestern Colombia. Unfortunately, that focus is on the highly unique and heavily chronicled "peace community" of San José de Apartadó, the most accompanied and robustly monitored, activist-backed site in all of Colombia. This is not to minimize the loss of life (eighteen dead), but it is striking indeed that we have such fine-tuned documentation here while the deaths of untold thousands in the Llanos, Chocó, Putumayo, and elsewhere, will forever remain unknown. Lindsay-Poland partially acknowledges this spectacular knowledge gap when he addresses the "False Positives." Thanks to Colombian human rights organizations, and confessions from a few Colombian army officers, we know that several thousand poor civilians were lured to their deaths in a quest to fulfill "dead guerrilla" body counts in the early 2000s, as mandated by the US military (the ghost of Robert McNamara lives on!). His contention that paramilitary and army violence was widespread and systemic is beyond dispute. We will never know how many Colombians died in the carnage from 1997 to 2010, which was the peak killing period since the FARC's emergence in the early 1960s. There is also little reason to doubt Lindsey-Poland's premise that state-funded terror swept away far more lives than the sloppy and vindictive guerrillas. Yet silly is his assertion that "grassroots movements inside and outside the United States can have a substantial impact on limiting or stopping US military intervention" (24). Does he believe that activism somehow limited US intervention in Colombia? [End Page 162] Activism could not even prevent army-paramilitary attacks on the heavily monitored hamlet of San José de Apartadó. What activist-authors like Lindsay-Poland consistently neglect to acknowledge is this: US policy in Colombia has materially benefitted the average (North) American. Much of this book is an indictment of that policy, and at times the author even points to economic factors and motives behind it (most overtly on p. 16). He singles out Al Gore, with his family's longstanding connections to Occidental Petroleum (which operates heavily in Colombia), but Gore is not alone in prospering from US policy. Washington's funding of the Colombian war machine was logical, given the Colombian government's longstanding and generous accommodation of US corporations (most importantly in the mining sector, where these businesses register as Canadian entities for tax and regulation purposes). In Urabá, agricultural products for export predominate, most notably bananas and palm oil. The FARC and other guerrilla groups, in contrast, openly critiqued capitalism and called for a more equitable distribution of wealth, both in Colombia and beyond. In a world where (North) Americans consume roughly seven times their proportion...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,341
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,348
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of global south studiesMême sujetConflict, Peace, and Violence in ColombiaTravaux en français237 207