MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3046659718 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.4552

John Theodore Houghton

2020· article· en· W3046659718 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAtmosphere (unit)HistoryScholarshipArt historyMeteorologyPhysicsLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Atmospheric physicist John Theodore Houghton died of complications of COVID-19 on 15 April 2020 following a long illness. He was born on 20 December 1931 in Dyserth in North Wales, not too far from his final retirement home in Tywyn, a village by the sea on the edge of the Snowdonia National Park. John Theodore Houghton FRED TAYLORPPT|High resolutionSomething of a child prodigy, at age 16 John won a scholarship to study physics at Oxford University and went on to be first in his class of 1951. His lecturers included luminaries such as Sydney Chapman and Gordon Dobson; they inspired him to stay on to study for a doctorate with Alan Brewer, who led a small meteorology group in Oxford’s Clarendon Laboratory. There John learned to make delicate IR radiometric measurements in the atmosphere the hard way—on a noisy and uncomfortable Mosquito aircraft left over from World War II.After some years at the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough, where he continued his aircraft measurements in lieu of active military service, John returned to Oxford in 1962 to take over the meteorology group when Brewer moved to Toronto. He and Des Smith discussed how superior radiation measurements could be made from the new generation of Earth satellites coming on line. They devised a selective chopper radiometer, which used cells containing carbon dioxide to filter the upwelling flux from the atmosphere and measure its intensity, and they flew a version of it on a high-altitude balloon into the stratosphere.Lewis Kaplan took a year’s leave from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) to work with John’s group in Oxford. Together, he and John showed that the radiation measurements could be inverted to obtain meteorologically useful vertical temperature profiles. John and Smith then boldly proposed to NASA that it fly their British instrument on one of the US experimental weather satellites and thus extend the capability to the global atmosphere. Nimbus 4, with the instrument on board, launched in April 1970; subsequent Nimbus satellites carried improved versions. The instrument on Nimbus 7, which launched in 1978, added composition measurements, including water vapor and nitrogen oxides, to the temperature profiles.In developing the space instruments, John had worked with two big government science laboratories, named after Edward Appleton and Ernest Rutherford. Taking leave from the university in 1969 to become director of Appleton, John was instrumental in merging the two labs into the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which is today the UK’s lead center for space technology.Having honed his skills as a manager and motivator, John could not resist an invitation to become director general of the UK Meteorological Office when the position became available in 1983. “I must be mad,” he told me after I returned from a 10-year stint at JPL and prepared to take over his Oxford department. Being leader of the Met Office was not an altogether smooth ride for John. The nadir came in October 1986, when a violent storm hit southern England and caused massive damage and loss of life, with no timely warning from the Met Office. Parliament members called for John’s resignation. The crisis blew over, however, and John went on not only to be an outstanding leader of the office, for which he earned a knighthood, but also to extend its purview in 1990 into longer-term forecasting by establishing the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.The Hadley Centre has become a cornerstone of the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Despite its modest name, it is far more than a panel, with thousands of scientists and others involved in writing, under the auspices of the United Nations, regular reports that assess and warn world governments about the probability and likely impact of climate change. The IPCC was created in 1988, with John as a leading light; he chaired the scientific assessment body and was lead author for several key publications. The job was no sinecure; the agreement of more than 100 diverse national groups had to be secured in the face of powerful opposition from lobby groups. John hated going to the meetings and sometimes came back shattered, but he persevered, driven by his strong religious faith and his conviction that he had a duty to apply his knowledge of climate physics to help the world avert what he saw as potential doom. With corecipient Al Gore, John and several other scientists accepted the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the IPCC.© 2020 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,382
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsTravaux en français237 207