Abstract B04: Three distinct subgroups of Wilms’ tumors with novel molecular features and important clinical implications are defined by genome-wide DNA methylation profiles
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Wilms’ tumor (WT) is the most common childhood renal cancer. Although many children are cured with standard therapy, survivors frequently suffer chronic diseases as a result of their treatment. Historical evidence suggests that a number of children could be cured with surgery alone; however, many of these children are currently difficult to identify. Although the majority of mutations described in this disease are not prognostic, the commonest single molecular alteration in WT is epigenetic—loss of imprinting at chromosome 11p15. We therefore examined genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation in WTs to identify groups of patients with low risk of relapse. Methods: We enrolled two cohorts of patients: a discovery cohort consisting of 32 tumors and 21 matched kidneys was recruited at the time of surgery at our hospital. A validation cohort included 40 tumor-normal pairs from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) biobank and an additional 11 pairs from our hospital. All samples had genome-wide DNA methylation and copy number variation data generated. The samples from COG additionally had whole-exome sequencing while 22 local tumors had RNA sequencing. Results: Unsupervised clustering of DNA methylation data demonstrated three DNA methylation subgroups that could be reproduced in the validation cohort using a “signature” of selected differentially methylated sites. One group (“PRO”) had genome-wide loss of methylation with specific gain of methylation at renal development genes and tumor-suppressor genes. This group also had increased expression of genes related to cell proliferation. Mutations in microRNA processing genes were found exclusively in this group and were associated with dysregulation of microRNA expression. All known cases of relapse were found in this group. A second group (“DIFF”) had a DNA methylation profile similar to normal kidney, no copy number alterations, reduced expression of genes associated with early renal development, and mutations only in WT1 or CTNNB1. No relapses were known in this group, but there was an increased incidence of bilateral disease. A third group (“INT”) had intermediate methylation values at all signature sites, a gene expression profile similar to the DIFF group, and increased microRNA dysregulation. All tumors in the INT group had either mutations in TRIM28, epithelial histology, or both. Discussion: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling demonstrates three subgroups of WT with distinct molecular and clinical characteristics. The DIFF group has molecular features consistent with a differentiation process occurring. These patients may be candidates for therapy reduction. The INT group suggests that some patients with wild-type TRIM28 share features with tumors with mutations in the gene—known to be associated with low risk of relapse. This group may also be a candidate for therapy reduction. We are now investigating the features that drive increased proliferation in the PRO group as these may be targets of future therapy for these higher-risk patients. Citation Format: Jack Brzezinski, Sanaa Choufani, Rodrigo Romao, Cheryl Shuman, Haiying Chen, Ronald Grant, Armando Lorenzo, Rosanna Weksberg. Three distinct subgroups of Wilms’ tumors with novel molecular features and important clinical implications are defined by genome-wide DNA methylation profiles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr B04.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».