MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3047313767 · doi:10.1111/rirt.13856

Tradition: Understanding Christian Tradition, GeraldO'Collins SJ, Oxford University Press, 2018 (ISBN 978‐0‐19‐883030‐6), xii + 148 pp., hb £20

2020· article· en· W3047313767 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Dominiak

Notice bibliographique

RevueReviews in Religion and Theology · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRevelationChristian traditionPhilosophyTheologyObject (grammar)Religious studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Gerald O'Collins is Professor Emeritus of the Gregorian University in Rome and perhaps one of the most prolific writers in fundamental theology of the modern age. O′Collins's Tradition follows two other recent volumes, Revelation (OUP, 2016) and Inspiration (OUP, 2018). These latter two works respectively attempt to articulate a theology of revelation focused on the divine self-revelation of Christ, and the distinction and overlap between revelation, tradition, and inspiration. Both of these aspects are picked up and fleshed out further in Tradition. In Tradition, O'Collins seeks to draw upon sociology in order to explore the central characteristics of what ‘tradition’ means and the place of it in human life, as well as the particularities of what we mean by ‘Christian Tradition’. O'Collins proposes a sense in which specifically Christian notions of ‘tradition’ depend upon a direct interpretive relationship with Scripture and revolve around Christ as the central Tradition being handed on, with the Holy Spirit acting as ‘the essential, if invisible, agent of tradition’ (p. vii). The book offers a way to deal with the challenge of discerning and reforming particular traditions in light of the relationships that inhere between tradition, Scripture, Christ, the Holy Spirit, and the Christian community. For such a short book, O'Collins provides a critical and constructive tour de force. O'Collins offers a key distinction in his introduction between tradition as a process of handing on (actus tradendi, traditio activa) and tradition as what is handed on as an object or content (traditum, traditio passiva). This distinction shapes the contours of later chapters. The first chapter sets out the ecumenical convergence on the character and purpose of ‘tradition’ in the 1963 Montreal Faith and Order Conference that anticipated the later Catholic reflections on tradition during Vatican II, especially Dei Verbum in 1965. There, revelation, tradition, and the Scriptures were seen as continuous aspects of divine self-disclosure and reception of that disclosure. Rather than seeing ‘tradition’ as a static deposit, Jesus Christ was affirmed as the central Tradition being passed on as a living reality possessing the Church. Within this ‘total view of Tradition’ (p. 15) sit many traditions in preaching, worship, doctrine, mission and life, expressing, and manifesting Jesus Christ. The second chapter goes on to explore how sociology provides insights into the role of tradition in human life and the difference that tradition makes. A helpful appendix on memory studies and tradition adds to what Chapter 2 draws from sociology. In Chapter 2, however, O'Collins retrieves four points in particular from the work of the University of Chicago sociologist, Edward Shils, that shape the rest of the work, along with his conceptual distinction between tradition as process and object. First is the ‘global view of the persistence of the past’ (p. 25) in which inherited ‘traditions’ inextricably shape everyone. Second, this inherited past inexorably shapes personal identity, even when people reject that which they inherit. Third, the ‘bearers of tradition’ (p. 28) are both official and institutional and also unofficial and quotidian. Fourth, that ‘tradition’ has stability without being static, meaning that there needs to be conscious awareness of what inspires and legitimates either stability or change. In light of the distinctions made in the first two chapters, Chapters 3 through 5 then unpack seven characteristics of ‘Christian tradition’ (in which Christ is the central traditum), examine the ways in which ‘tradition’ is transmitted in the lives of the faithful and inspired by the Holy Spirit, and explore the mutual interpretive dependence of Scripture and tradition as witnesses to Christ. Chapter 6 considers how discernment is exercised in relation to current Christian traditions and in terms of retrieving forgotten traditions. O'Collins ends by suggesting ‘four questions … that should guide the task of discerning existing traditions’ (p. 121). O′Collins's book is a triumph of textual clarity, breadth of critical engagement, generosity of tone, and creativity of application. He takes up the promising but under-developed ecumenical promise of the 1960s, applying sociological categories in order to open up how we might understand the nature and importance of tradition in human and Christian life. He provides practical, sanguine, and realistic guidance as to how the breadth of Christian understandings might be able to converge on ‘tradition’ not as a source of conflict and intractable debate over a theological warrant but as a common and yet manifold witness to the self-disclosure of God in Jesus Christ made present to us. O'Collins gives a clear sense of how the Scriptures ‘play a major role for those who wish to discern the health or otherwise of existing tradition’ (p. 121), but how such a discernment must also be attentive to other religions and to secular atheism. Any cavils are small and almost embarrassing to mention in an otherwise commendable book. First, while there is an index of names, there is not a topical index. Given the breadth of conceptual engagement, this absence is a shame. Second, O'Collins at a number of points takes extensive pains to refute a negative review of an earlier work of his. In an otherwise charitable book, these excursions, often in footnote form, seem churlish. Yet such issues are miniscule in comparison to a fine achievement by O'Collins. It would be exciting to see if O'Collins might in future works consider reason and experience as other theological warrants in light of the centrality of divine revelation and inspiration.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,104

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0060,008
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0310,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,091
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,153 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReviews in Religion and Theology→Même sujetReformation and Early Modern Christianity→Travaux en français237 207→