Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mark TwainBaseball's First OG Rick Burton (bio) Is it possible Samuel Clemens (a.k.a. Mark Twain) was baseball's first OG? Its Original Godfather? History suggests he clearly embraced the game, and according to the August 18, 1886, St. Louis Post-Dispatch,1 Twain even used his considerable (but often poorly invested) wealth to start "backing the Hartford base ball club with money." Additionally, his 1889 novel, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court,2 featured a sizeable reference to baseball. Those two actions and numerous others likely made him one of baseball's earliest and most prominent celebrity endorsers. Clemens, the author, story-teller, raconteur, humorist, social critic and statesman, would never have felt an obligation to grow a participatory activity such as baseball. But in the span of his remarkable life, a journey that took him from adventurous boyhood to print shop apprentice, journalist, steamboat pilot and celebrity, Mark Twain's creativity seemed to frequently favor a youthful appreciation of play and possibility. In that way, baseball served Twain's rough-and-tumble inner boy. Baseball was both play and organized sport, but it was also rough enough given its capacity for broken fingers, stolen bases and collisions on the base paths. When Clemens was born in 1835 in Florida, Missouri, the organized sport of "base ball" wasn't yet culturally relevant and hardly national in a country featuring just twenty-four states and fewer than 15 million inhabitants. America's fertile sixth decade, however, saw Americans feverishly experimenting with combinations of "stick-and-ball" games, seemingly determined to change Britain's cricket or "rounders" into versions affectionately known as the New York Game, Massachusetts Game, Town Ball, Base Ball, and Goal Ball. The rules for rounders were printed in The Boy's Own Book, a collection of children's games written by William Clarke in London and the U.S. in 1829. [End Page 4] Five years later, in 1834, a Boston publisher placed rounders in "The Book of Sports by Robin Carver, but changed Rounders into 'Base or Goal Ball' because, as Carver noted, these were 'the names generally adopted in our country.' Thus English rounders was transformed into American baseball."3 Twain's early access to "sport" in any published form would have been limited. As Robert McChesney points out, "prior to the 1830s, the preponderance of newspapers and magazines were directed at a relatively small and well-to-do portion of American society."4 By the 1850s, the time of Twain's teenage years, William Trotter Porter's Spirit of the Times was "the dominant sport periodical," and while he had expanded his sports coverage from horse racing to boxing, his efforts "to establish cricket as the national game" had failed.5 This was an era (1830–50) birthing the modern newspaper industry and showing local printers they could "generate profit as much from the sale of advertising space as from circulation."6 Ron Powers confirms as much writing, "the newspaper age was dawning in America, [and it was] an age that would effloresce into mass communication and the formation of a transformative popular culture. Sam Clemens, who would come to define that culture, was there from the beginning."7 That was because Sam's older brother, Orion, and Clemens himself were quick to see the emerging journalism trade as an escape from the failures of their father, John Marshall. Sam, in particular, would start as a "printer's devil" in the late 1840s before emerging as an apprentice in June 1848 and as a full-time hand at Orion's paper, the Hannibal Journal, in January 1851. If newspapers were booming, it was a somewhat vexing time for competitive sporting activities since sport had previously been "considered vulgar and disreputable among a large portion of the American reading public. Many of those who wrote for the sporting press at this time did so under pseudonyms, to protect their real identities."8 In the case of the Spirit of the Times, Porter quickly realized that due to the sudden 1850s success of Frank Queen's New York Clipper (and their hiring of America's first full-fledged sportswriter, Henry Chadwick...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,383 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».