MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3049639815 · doi:10.1353/nin.2018.0018

No Place I Would Rather Be: Roger Angell and a Life in Baseball Writing by Joe Bonomo

2018· article· en· W3049639815 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mitchell J Nathanson

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyPrivilege (computing)ArtPoetryLiteratureLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: No Place I Would Rather Be: Roger Angell and a Life in Baseball Writing by Joe Bonomo Mitchell Nathanson Joe Bonomo. No Place I Would Rather Be: Roger Angell and a Life in Baseball Writing. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2019. 232 pp. Cloth, $27.95. It could not have been easy to write about Roger Angell. First off, his life story certainly isn't out of the Horatio Alger mold. Angell was born with a silver spoon in his mouth that he soon traded in for gold. If privilege were a lake, he would have drowned by grade school. It's not every kid who could read about his parents' divorce in the pages of The New York Times (5) or of his mother's remarriage—to E. B. White—in a Walter Winchell column (5). Speaking of his mother, Katherine, she was the fiction and poetry editor at the New Yorker, so the fact that Roger would wind up there as well is hardly the sort of achievement that could possibly gobsmack readers. And then there is Angell's writing, that sways heavy like an anvil over the head of anybody who dares to compete with him, which a biographer has no choice but to do. "At a night game," Angell wrote in a 1964 New Yorker piece on [End Page 136] the Polo Grounds partially reprinted within the book, "the moon rising out of the scoreboard like a spongy, day-old orange balloon and then whitening over the waves of noise and the slow, shifting clouds of floodlit cigarette smoke" (49). Who would be crazy enough to try to top that? Thankfully, Joe Bonomo took on the task of writing about Angell and, just as thankfully, was not crazy enough to attempt to beat him in a war of the sentences. Instead, what he has produced is a lively take on Angell's baseball writing—enough to put it all in context and to do what all good literary biographies do: send the reader sprinting to the subject's work. Bonomo hedges a bit at the outset of his book, alleging that it's not so much a biography as a literary analysis (xiv), although he intersperses snippets of Angell's life story throughout. So let's call it a quasi-biography. Angell warned that he would not cooperate if Bonomo intended to do a deep dive into his life, and mercifully, Bonomo had no plans to do that anyway. There's only so much about a life ensconced within the Upper East Side/Harvard/the New Yorker that a reader can comfortably swallow. Instead, Bonomo, who teaches in the English department at Northern Illinois University when he's not writing about music, puts on his professor's cap and guides the reader through Angell's baseball writing, identifying themes, and even words ("startle" is an Angell favorite, as is "wintry") that run through his New Yorker pieces. He identifies Angell's "season of discontent" (57) in 1976 when Angell, for the first time, wrote that he no longer felt at home at the ballpark. Yankee Stadium had just reopened after a massive refurbishment and Angell had trouble recognizing it. Combined with the labor unrest that was percolating throughout baseball, Angell wondered if the game had irretrievably changed. "I don't know what to think," Angell wrote at the time, "because it may be that the money and the size of sport have grown too big for me after all" (57). Bonomo adeptly notes that while Angell recovered a bit, "the mid-decade malaise had left a mark. He was never quite the same fan again …" (58–59). Fans of Angell who might wonder why they need to read about their favorite baseball writer when they already have his work in front of them would do well to pick this book up anyway; for all of Angell's talents he cannot put his own work into context. Bonomo does and reading him here helps to deepen one's appreciation of Angell's writing and perspective. Perhaps the most striking insight I gained while reading this book is that although we tend to think of Angell...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,184
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,950

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0510,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207