Empire of Infields: Baseball in Taiwan and Cultural Identity, 1895–1968 by John J. Harney
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Empire of Infields: Baseball in Taiwan and Cultural Identity, 1895–1968 by John J. Harney Lee Kluck John J. Harney. Empire of Infields: Baseball in Taiwan and Cultural Identity, 1895–1968. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2019. 240 pp. Cloth, $50. Books about the role of baseball in identity building of a nation state are becoming more numerous as primary sources from the far reaches of the globe are proliferated through various mediums. Nowhere is this more rightly the case than when examining the role of baseball in the building of national identities in countries within the continent of Asia and the greater Pacific region. There are numerous titles outlining the role of baseball in Japanese society and a growing number of texts dealing with the role baseball played [End Page 148] in the American campaign to bring democracy to the far flung reaches of the greater Pacific region. Beyond that, there are various titles that attempt to outline the role of baseball in the building of a Taiwanese national identity. The most recent of these titles, Empire of Infields: Baseball in Taiwan and Cultural Identity, 1895–1968, by John J Harney, a professor of history and the director of the Asian Studies program at Centre College, is a groundbreaking text that looks to reframe the role of baseball in Taiwanese history. It certainly does that and will become an important text for those looking to examine baseball in a world-wide context. What makes Harney's work so valuable is that the author successfully shows that, unlike instances in numerous other countries and in the American Pacific territories, "there is little evidence of the colonial government's utilizing the sport to over 'Japanize' the local Taiwanese" (160). Nor did the indigenous population use baseball as a form of pseudo combat to prove that they were better than their Japanese rulers. Instead, Harney adroitly shows that the inclusion of baseball in the Japanese program was originally done by the Japanese not as a way to assimilate the Taiwanese into the Japanese way of life but as a way to help "young Japanese professionals moving to a new colony in the 1900s" maintain ties to the home islands (160). The game then became popular among the local population in a gradual fashion due to the fact that Japan provided the "framework and machinery" for this to occur (160). This included providing baseball tours of Taiwan by Japanese college teams, press coverage of the game by the Japanese controlled newspapers, the commercialization of the game in the colonies through the barnstorming of first Japanese and then colonial teams, and the growth of organized baseball tournaments. With all this support, Harney shows that baseball as it became played by the Taiwanese was Japanese in its roots and that these roots spread on the island, even after World War II, as a natural extension of the positive influence that Japan had developed on the Island of Taiwan among the indigenous population. All of these points are clearly made using primary source material found on the Island of Taiwan and a secondary source list that is robust and covers a wide range of topics. This includes but is not limited to, baseball, the spread of nationalism both in Asia and globally, the role of sports in that spread, and the study of Japanese colonial endeavors. Of particular note is the wonderful job Harney does of placing his work in the context of previous texts on baseball in Taiwan. One does not get the sense by reading this work that Harney set out to discredit the works of previous [End Page 149] scholars. However, he is quick to point out that the situation he describes, baseball growing through popular appeal that was fostered in conjunction with and not in opposition to, Japan, is a much different tact than his predecessors. To hammer home his point, Harney uses the conclusion to show that during the late Cold War and into the twenty-first century, the government of the Republic of China, with the help of scholars and purveyors of popular culture, have coopted the game and history of baseball in order to shape what they...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».