Dialyzing the Academic Misconduct from the Academic Exchange System/DIALYSER D'INCONDUITE DE L'ACADEMIQUE DU SYSTEME D'ECHANGE UNIVERSITAIRES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract At presently, the Academic dishonorable behavior had become a bad phenomenon in the academic circles. This paper points out that it was the result of the whole of the academic exchange system, and the author is only one of respect. The paper analyzes the causes of and countermeasures from authors, publishers, library and information institutions, users, etc.. And pointes out that the phenomenon of academic belongs to social problem that requires a wide range of common boycott. Key Words: Academic dishonorable behavior; Academic exchange system; Analysis of reasons Resume A l'heure actuelle, le comportement deshonorant de l'academique est devenue un phenomene mal dans les milieux universitaires. Ce document souligne que c'etait le resultat de l'ensemble du systeme d'echange universitaire, et l'auteur est un seul de respect. Le document analyse les causes et les contre-mesures par des auteurs, des editeurs, des institutions de bibliotheques et d'information, les utilisateurs, etc et souligne que le phenomene de la academique appartient a un probleme social qui necessite un large eventail de boycott commune. Mots cles: Comportement deshonorant de l'enseignement; Academique du Systeme d'echange; Analyse des raisons INTRODUCTION Academic misconduct has become a major drawback in the modern society. So far, many articles have stated this phenomenon. The author had retrieved more than 100 records from the Chinese full-text journals database and after reading and analyzing those texts, the author found that those paper were mainly talking about the study of academic misconduct, the definition of academic misconduct and its causes, and moreover they were researched this problem mainly from the author's point of view (Lu, 2007). In fact, the author is only one part of the entire system. This issue has more to do with the entire academic communication system rather than just a part of the whole. Because that more or less reflects another kind of social phenomena associated with the digital age, with globalization, with things speeding up, the... the hyperspeed of the internet... . ELEMENTS OF THE ACADEMIC EXCHANGE SYSTEM Author No matter from the traditional or modern academic exchange system, we can find that the authors are at the forefront of the system, they create the research works which are published by the publishing company. Throughout the academia, I think that the authors can be divided into two groups, one is the real academic leaders, they work hard not for fame or fortune, but only for the learning. And they always stand in the front of the subject, leading the new areas of academic development. The other part is perhaps the stream of academic misconduct, including someone who does not have the ability of scientific research or conditions, or maybe they are compelled helpless by the technical titles, assessment and eager for success, so there is the formation of plagiarism, forgery, tampering and other fraudulent malpractices. We know that a new concept or a new point is filled with the author's intellectual work. There is no denying that it embodies the author's hard labor. Even each word in the article is the author's thoughtful crystallization. Therefore simply taking other people's work is the ultimate disrespectful to both the author and the academic accomplishment. According to statistics, since the 1980s, the book named Marxist Philosophy in China or like that was published more than 500 kinds of versions. Despite the great work of Marxist, as a basis for materials used for students, is this really necessary to publish so many versions? If there is a new point of view in each book, and we will have all more than 500 types (Yang, 2005), there should be a new Das Capital being written. Marx has spent nearly 40 years writing Das Capital, now days, scholars can write several books and countless papers in few years. Although someone made a comment or behind indicate the source in the article, they can't copy directly from the context being not modified. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».