63 A Needs Assessment of Syrian Refugee Families Regarding a Children & Youth Health Promotion Program in Arabic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Refugee families, particularly children and youth, are considered a vulnerable population. They face many health concerns, including barriers to accessing the healthcare system, which may stem from lack of familiarity with the health care system. Despite the great efforts Canada is putting forward to address newcomer needs, there are limited health promotion efforts directed at Arabic-speaking refugee families, particularly in the wake of the influx of Syrian families since 2015. In fact, there is a lack of well-structured, evidence-based, health promotion program, specifically focusing on Arabic-speaking refugee children and youth. Objectives Design/Methods We took a qualitative approach, in which semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, coded and analyzed using a qualitative framework technique. Six focus groups were conducted, in which a total of 25 Arabic-speaking refugee parents were interviewed by Arabic-speaking interviewers. Results Among the 25 participants, 18 reported that they were not aware of existing health promotion presentations in our local area. Moreover, none of the 7 participants who were aware of such presentations have ever attended any. The major reason reported is not being invited to attend. Additionally, of the 25 participants, 24 have expressed their desire of having a child and youth health promotion program in Arabic. Among the most requested topics to be presented include medication coverage and pharmacy access in Canada, first-aid management, dental care, interpretation services, healthy lifestyle, fever measurement and management, prevention of unintentional injuries, navigating the Canadian healthcare system and mental health. Moreover, several factors were described to facilitate the families’ attendance to the health promotion presentations. These include presenting about topics of relevance to the refugee families, having the presentations in Arabic, providing parking spaces, having someone to accompany the families’ children during the presentations, arranging the presentations over the weekend or after 5 pm during the weekdays and holding the presentations in a place close to where the families live. Conclusion Arabic-speaking refugee families describe strong interest in attending in-person health promotion sessions in Arabic, focusing on child and youth health, and outline diverse topics of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».