32 Web-based Camera (NICView) as a sense of proximity tool: a Quality-Improvement initiative for parents of neonates admitted in the NICU
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Family-centered care (FCC) is an important approach and a vital component in healthcare. However, implementation of FCC model in a clinical setting presents a challenge. Effective parent-health care provider relationships are very essential in NICU especially when treatment is complex during the management of critically-ill neonates. Web-based camera (WBC) systems have been used in a few NICUs in the USA and the UK, allowing virtual visitation of the family members. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no center in Canada that has utilized this WBC (NICView ®) service. NICView® is a WBC mounted to the baby’s bed, which is streaming ‘live’ video around-the-clock to parents and families. We report the perception of parents and their satisfaction after using NICView® facility in our NICU. Objectives Our goal was to see if the WBC system reduced the anxiety and stress level in parents by exploring NICView ® as a tool to enhance FCC model. This study was designed to explore the perception of parents and their satisfaction levels during their newborns stay within our NICU. Design/Methods A prospective, questionnaire-based study conducted over 6-month period. Determinants that may facilitate or disrupt the use of a commercially-available camera device were identified. After signing an informed consent form, the parents utilized the camera service continuously throughout the newborn stay within the NICU, except during the times of procedures, feedings and routine baby care. Demographic information of parents was collected in the questionnaire, along with along satisfaction questions. Parents filled out the questionnaires after 1-week of utilization of the camera or sooner if the baby was getting discharged. Results 94 respondents completed the questionnaire. Parental perception was consistent with earlier studies. Almost all parents used the service on a regular basis, twenty NICView cameras had more than 7000 logins by respondents during study period. Family members residing out of Saskatoon or out-of-SK and in some instances out-of-Canada used it the most, especially working fathers or distant grandparents. Seventy-five percent of the respondents were mothers. Almost 89% of parents reported having the WBC system helped reduce their anxiety and stress levels. All parents (100%) recommended this WBC system to other parents and strongly agreed that NICView was easy to use. Nearly 98% of parents agreed that they felt very connected with their baby using the WBC system. Frequently reported comments were on the positioning of camera like incorrect camera placement that did not offer a good view of the baby, the need to call nurses sometimes to turn on or adjust the camera after care, using the chat option to adjust the camera position when moved away. After we saw these frequent comments, we had to reiterate to bed-side nurses to re-position the camera if moved away and reminded parents to make use of the NICView® 24-hr customer support service available offered by the company. Conclusion
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».