66 Piloting a respectful challenges workshop in pediatric residency training
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Unaddressed conflict has been shown to negatively impact resident wellness and patient safety, and development of communication and conflict resolution skills are key competencies in medical education. While there are a number of existing communication training programs directed at healthcare providers, these can be costly and difficult to accommodate in an already packed curriculum. We developed a conflict resolution workshop to address local conflict scenarios facing our residents that could be integrated into our program curriculum at no cost. Objectives Evaluate resident satisfaction with the addition of a “respectful challenges” workshop to our training program’s academic curriculum. Design/Methods We designed a two- hour workshop for pediatric residents at our institution focusing on addressing conflict during residency training. A didactic lecture outlining different approaches was followed by three role-playing scenarios with coaching (conflict with another resident, allied health and faculty). The workshop was facilitated by a senior resident and faculty identified by residents as “approachable”. Residents (PGY1-4) were asked to evaluate the workshop’s content and effectiveness as well as their own comfort addressing conflict using pre and post-surveys with Likert scales. Results of the survey were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 15 residents were involved in the workshop and completed the pre and post surveys. Eleven were female. Six indicated that they had some form of previous training in conflict management. All residents reported having experienced workplace conflict at least a few times per year, but most said they didn’t always address it (73%). Twelve (80%) thought it was either “quite” or “extremely important” that conflict resolution skills be taught in residency. All 15 residents felt that the scenarios represented real life and that the format was an appropriate way to discuss conflict in the workplace. The majority of residents felt the workshop helped them better understand their approach to conflict and allowed them to feel better prepared to face challenges in the future (14/15 and 11/15 rated as “quite” or “extremely”). Eighty percent of residents reported that they would feel more comfortable addressing workplace conflict after the workshop. Conclusion This concise workshop provided a foundation on conflict resolution for our residents. The use of role play and coaching during simulated scenarios was well received, and residents reported increased comfort approaching workplace conflict in the future. Further evaluation will be important to determine if residents translate these skills into practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».