55 Profiles of Sleep Problems among Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Sleep problems are more common and severe among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to their typically developing peers. The goal of this study was to characterize sleep problems profiles and their clinical correlates, based on a five-factor model of the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) among preschool children with ASD. Objectives (1) To describe empirically-derived patterns (i.e., latent profiles) of sleep problems among young children with ASD; and (2) To examine relations between family cumulative risk and emotional-behavioral dysregulation symptoms and sleep profile membership. Design/Methods The study included 318 three-to-five year old children (M= 49.45 months; SD = 5.77). Latent profile analysis was used to identify and describe profiles of sleep problems. Sleep problems were assessed using a previously established CSHQ five-factor model: (1) Bedtime Routine; (2) Sleep Onset & Duration; (3) Night Waking; (4) Morning Waking; and (5) Sleep Disordered Breathing, with higher scores indicating greater problems. We assess whether profile membership was associated with dysregulation difficulties (CBCL 1.5-5) and family cumulative risk index (CRI; constructed based on socioeconomic status, maternal distress, family functioning, and other related factors) using a three-step method (Vermunt & Magidson, 2013). Results A five-profile model of children’s sleep problems showed the best fit (Figure 1). Profile 1, Nighttime Sleep Problems (28%), consisted of children with scores around the sample mean, except relatively lower scores on Morning Waking. Profile 2, Severe Sleep Problems (25%), consisted of children with relatively high scores across all sleep problems. Profile 3, Low Sleep Problems (18%), included children with the lowest levels of all sleep problems. Profile 4, Moderate Sleep Problems (17%), included children with all sleep problem levels near the sample mean. Profile 5, Morning Waking Problems (12%), consisted of children with low scores on Bedtime Routine problems but pronounced Morning Waking problems. Dysregulation difficulties (Wald = 13.90; p = .001) and family CRI (Wald = 13.27; p =.001) emerged as significant predictors of profile membership. Higher CRI was associated with higher odds of membership in Profile 2 (Severe Sleep Problems), and lower scores for dysregulation difficulties were associated with higher odds of membership in Profile 3 (Low Sleep Problems). Conclusion Children with ASD present distinct profiles of sleep problems that differ, not only by overall severity, but also by relative severity across types of sleep problems. Children’s dysregulation and family risk should be considered in examining children’s sleep.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».