67 Airway Skills in Paediatrics: Infants are Not Just Little Children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Airway skills such as intubation and bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM) have historically been considered necessary skills for all general paediatricians. Recently, evidence has driven practice toward goals of reduced invasive respiratory intervention and support. While patient outcomes have improved, implications include reduced airway skill training opportunities for paediatric residents, and possibly challenges in maintaining proficiency for practicing paediatricians. From postgraduate and continuing professional educational perspectives, the specific airway skill needs for Canadian paediatricians in contemporary practice are unclear. Objectives Identify those airway skills that are critical to general paediatric practice in Canada, and whether the skill needs differ by patient age. Design/Methods Data on general paediatric procedural practice was collected in 2018 via a one-time survey through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program. A database was created from the 938 collected responses. The survey asked paediatricians to indicate the frequency of performance, opinion of importance, and challenges in maintaining proficiency of various airway procedures. Data was analyzed descriptively, and questions discriminating infant (age < 2y) vs. child (age ≥ 2y) were compared by chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Results In total, 481 (51.3%) respondents worked ≥ 50% in general paediatrics and formed the main analysis group. Responses represented broad ranges of career duration, national geography, and practice settings. BVM of infants was the most commonly performed procedure, with 196 (40.8%) performing this monthly. Infant intubation was performed monthly by 58 (12.1%). A total of 355 (73.8%) and 402 (83.6%) reported never performing laryngeal-mask airway insertion and tracheostomy tube exchange respectively. Both BVM and intubation were performed significantly more frequently in infants than in children (p < 0.001). While many respondents considered BVM and intubation of children as essential skills, significantly more rated performing these skills on infants as essential to their practice (p < 0.001). Of those paediatricians that performed procedures as part of their practice, 68/309 (22.0%) and 192/304 (63.2%) reported difficulty in maintaining proficiency in the skills of infant BVM and intubation respectively. Conclusion Although variably utilized, airway skills in infants and children remain a core aspect of practice for many general paediatricians. Specifically, skills related to infants were performed more frequently and were more often rated as essential. Most respondents felt it was challenging to maintain proficiency in several airway skills. Accordingly, airway skills, especially those involving infants, should be emphasized in paediatric residency programs and continuing professional development activities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».