MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3076815232 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.099

100 Just how long does it take? Using parental surveys documenting time required to provide care at home to children with medical complexity as a tool for advocacy

2020· article· en· W3076815232 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Audrey Lafontaine, Hema Patel, Isabelle St-Sauveur

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNursingMultidisciplinary approachMedical homeMedicinePopulationHealth careMedical educationPsychologyFamily medicinePrimary care

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Children with medical complexity (CMC) constitute a growing population here and everywhere. CMC are fragile, complex, and dependent on technology. Sustainable, safe and effective care at home requires a high level of parental dedication, in knowledge, skills and time. While children thrive in the home setting, the demands on caregivers are substantial. As part of a larger advocacy project, a collaboration between healthcare professionals looking after CMC in Quebec was formed with a primary goal to create evidence-based standardized guidelines for homecare practices. During this process, wide disparities in actual care support received were noted as was the paucity of publication quantifying the time it takes to care for CMC at home. This innovative survey was planned to better describe families’ experiences and to further advocacy efforts with the development of data-driven care support recommendations. Objectives The objectives of this prospective survey were: a) to quantify daily parental expenditure of time to provide care at home to their child requiring i) parenteral nutrition (TPN), ii) peritoneal dialysis (PD), iii) noninvasive ventilation (BIPAP) or iv) tracheostomy care (TC) and b) to qualitatively explore the perceptions of parents regarding existing and desired homecare supports. Design/Methods Quebec CMC were identified through collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from each pediatric university hospital center and the provincial home ventilation program. The daily care required for CMC was described step-by-step with input from CMC’s parents with either TPN, PD, BIPAP or TC. A survey was developed to estimate time required by parents for care completion related to technology, medication, enteral feeding, maintenance of equipment and care organization. Open ended questions on parental perceptions of existing and desired homecare supports were included. The surveys were sent to all eligible families by their primary pediatrician or nurse. Data were entered into a database. For each care intervention, descriptive analyses were performed to determine the median (interquartile range) time required. Thematic analyses were used to evaluate open ended responses. Summary data was used by the expert collaboration to draft data-driven homecare support recommendations for CMC in Quebec and create request template to translate the recommendations into a practical tool for advocacy. Results A total of 87 parents of CMC were surveyed and 78 with complete quantitative data were available for analysis. For TPN, 14 surveys were available. The median (interquartile range) of total daily time dedicated to medical care was 259 (180) minutes a day, with care distributed through TPN administration and preparation (62 (49) minutes/day), enteral nutrition when indicated (42 (34) minutes/day), medication (48 (70) minutes/day) and meal (135(98) minutes/day). For PD, 12 surveys were available. Total daily time dedicated to medical care was 160 (111) minutes/day, with care distributed through dialysis administration and preparation (58 (19) minutes/day), enteral nutrition when indicated (35 (25) minutes/day), medication (35 (28) minutes/day) and other medical care (46 (24) minutes/day). For BIPAP, 39 surveys were available. Total daily time dedicated to care directly associated with BIPAP use was 18 (15) minutes/day. Total daily time dedicated to medical care was 55 (77) minutes/day when well, and 83 (180) minutes/day when sick. Respiratory care was 31 (42) minutes/day when well, and 48 (125) minutes/day when sick. Medication administration was 20 (22) minutes/day when well and 28 (60) minutes/day when sick. Personnel and equipment management was reported to take a median of 55 (interquartile range 119) minutes/week. For TC, 13 surveys were available. Total daily time dedicated to medical care was 109 (239) minutes/day, with 87 (111) minutes/days of direct tracheostomy care. Parents of CMC asked for further support in those categories: financial help, help with home task, respite, nighttime help and specialized support. Conclusion Parents provide substantial care at home for CMC. This study provides a first look at the actual time required to perform care. Although widely distributed, those time data give a first and unique overview of the task for parents taking care of CMC. Data driven recommendations for care support at home were created, along with standardized care request templates which are now in regular use in Quebec, demonstrating a powerful tool for advocacy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,095
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,188

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,028
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→Travaux en français237 207→