14 Head to Toe Practice: Implementation and Outcomes of a Suicide Screener in Pediatric Hospital Inpatient Units
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction/Background Suicide remains the second leading cause of death in Canadian children and youth (Public Health Agency of Canada, 2019). Recent studies show that 50-80% individuals who die by suicide have had contact with a healthcare provider within one month prior to their death (Ahmedani et. al., 2014; Vasiliadis et. al., 2015). Unfortunately, these patients often present solely with physical complaints and infrequently discuss suicidal thoughts and plans unless asked directly. Those with medical conditions are also at a higher risk of experiencing mental health difficulties. Following a critical incident in our hospital, the corporate leadership committee addressed opportunities for improvement, and recommended the integration of routine suicide screening into standard care for all pediatric patients admitted to hospital. Objectives Prior to implementation of the transformative Head to Toe (term coined by a family caregiver during stakeholder interviews) initiative, suicide screening was routinely part of the admission assessment in the inpatient mental health units and for patients presenting to the emergency department with mental health concerns. In February 2019 we began a step-wise implementation of the Head to Toe suicide screening for all youth 12 and older admitted to the medical and surgical inpatient units at out institution using a psychometrically validated tool, the Ask Suicide Screening Questionnaire (ASQ) (Horowitz et. al, 2012). Design/Methods During the admission process, the nurse administers the ASQ and documents patients’ eligibility for screening and their responses on the ASQ items in the electronic health record. If a patient positively endorses an ASQ item(s) the nurse communicates this to the most responsible physician, who initiates a consult to mental health. Youth who endorse a positive screen receive a brief mental health risk assessment within 24 hours conducted by a mental health nurse. Patients who disclose active suicidal thoughts on the ASQ are assessed directly by psychiatry as soon as possible and actions are taken to ensure patient safety. A framework was developed for continuous evaluation of key components of the Head to Toe practice. Since the end of July 2019, when all medical/surgical units went live with the Head to Toe project, we have monitored compliance with the screening protocol on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. Results We are the first pediatric hospital in Canada to implement systematic screening for suicide risk in medically or surgically hospitalized children and youth. Initial data indicate that during the first six months of the full implementation of the Head to Toe suicide screening, 72% (396) of eligible patients were screened with 14% (57) of these identified as having thoughts of suicide or a previous attempt and proceeding to further mental health assessment. Daily review of compliance rates on each unit allows us to identify omissions in patient screening and provide one-on-one support to staff to facilitate timely completion of the ASQ, while the weekly and monthly compliance reports are reviewed with unit staff and leadership to identify and address factors impeding compliance with Head to Toe care pathways and monitor change in adherence patterns. This ensures the sustainability of the Head to Toe initiative and provides opportunities for celebrating successes. We are also currently collecting qualitative feedback from youth and families about their experiences participating in the Head to Toe process. Conclusion This presentation will describe the steps to ensure successful implementation of suicide screening in our hospital setting, the challenges encountered and possible solutions. The hope is that this new practice will reduce emergency hospital visits for mental health crises and facilitate early access to mental health services. This initiative can be used to support other hospitals in implementing their own suicide prevention screening programs, along with informing policy about ways to help prevent suicide in youth populations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».