Notice bibliographique
Résumé
So much has happened since the last editorial in April! Never have the necessities of comprehensive bio-psychosocial-spiritual approaches become more glaring. The COVID Archives – Between April 17, 2020 and June 22, 2020, the recorded number of global cases increased from 1.36 million with 76 000 deaths to 9.04 million with 470 000 deaths. In the United States, they increased from 370 000 cases to 2.31 million with 120 000 deaths. The recorded figures for Canada increased from 16 700 cases with 360 deaths to 103 000 with 8500 deaths. It also became more apparent that the number of cases depended on the prevalence of testing provided while the number of deaths is considered somewhat more reliable. These staggering figures are humbling. Their details also highlight significant gaps in our society's network of health resources. Chief among them was our marginal resources for the care of our elderly and in particular those institutionalized. Addressing Systemic Racism – On May 25, we were confronted with the excruciating, recorded death of George Floyd in Minnesota. This event, occurring at a time where people faced their fears of the pandemic, mass unemployment and isolation, sparked a global movement to redress long standing grievances about discrimination, oppression and police brutality among racial, ethnic and all identified “others”. Analysis of the COVID statistics predictably report higher prevalence among the same identified population groups. On June 10, a video of the March 10th “alleged” assault by RCMP on Chief Allan Adam from the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation was released, bringing a similar reckoning in our country. In both cases, police dashcam videos, along with videos by witnesses, proved to be game changers for public opinion. Is there a lesson for us as we witness the stigmatization of our patients with addiction and mental illness? It is no surprise that the compounding effect of these social upheavals has resulted in a current spike in overdoses as well. There are now daily promises of sea change which are of relevance to our field. The changes advocated may finally result in the creation of multidisciplinary response teams to respond to addiction and mental health crises instead of sole interventions by law enforcement. The resulting mental health burden of the epidemic for population and care providers alike is also gaining increasing public attention. These crises have long simmered and there is, as yet, no end in sight. This issue of the journal includes six articles reflecting the broad scope of our field. Two of the articles analyze the impact of a comprehensive strategy: Hubberstey and Rutman provide a positive investment analysis of Her Way Program for pregnant and parenting women with substance use issues and other complex factors; Dalton et al describe the experience of health care facilities for challenging emerging adults with substance use disorders and addressing barriers and facilitators of treatment retention. In the current opioid epidemic, the intertwined roles of the pharmaceutical industry and government regulators is highlighted in the commentary by Fischer and Haines-Saah. Points of care drug checking screen for the presence of major psychoactive drugs but the presence of a number of unrecognized adulterants must also be detected. Tobias et al provide a case point with the occasional presence of xylazine, a depressant which may perpetuate desirable effects of opioids. Lucatch et al analyze a small sample of participants with comorbid cannabis use and major depressive disorder who underwent 28 days of cannabis abstinence. Extended abstinence from cannabis was associated with improvement of depressive symptoms. This issue concludes with a literature review by Mauer-Vakil and Bahji. It dissects the still contentious relationship between Compulsive Sexual Behaviour Disorder and Problematic Online Pornography Use (POPU). These disorders are under consideration to be included in the expanding diagnostic category of behavioural addictions. Finally, it is my pleasure to report the promotion of Dr. Anees Bahji, who was Early Career Editor, to the role of Assistant Editor. We are also working with a group of outstanding Early Career Editors: Mariya Cherkasova is in her second year, and we recently welcomed Jasmine Turna PhD, Marlon Danilewitz MD and Emily Hawken PhD. They are the future of the journal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».