The Public Health Dimensions of the Global Ecological Integrity Group (GEIG) Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, July 9-16, 2011
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Global Ecological Integrity Group (GEIG) held its 1 9th annual conference at Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic, July 11-16, 2011. The conference was graciously hosted by Prof. Vladimir Bencko of the Charles University's First Faculty of Medicine in Prague, who, along with Professors Laura Westra and Colin Soskolne of Canada also co -organised the event. John Quinn provided invaluable support to all delegates throughout the conference. Delegates numbered 55, from 15 countries. Kind sponsors included the First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague which provided magnificent conference facilities as well as refreshments throughout the 5 -day event. The support provided by Sanofi-Pasteur in hosting our welcome reception in the historic Faust's House will go down as GEIG' s best-ever such welcome event. And, not to forget all of the memorable experiences that come with being in one of the worlds great, historic, and intact cities that combine history with modernity; the boat and walking tours were highlights for the delegates, providing keen opportunities for immersion in over 1,000 years of history. This 19th GEIG conference was particularly significant because the topic Human Rights and Duties: Supporting Biological Integrity for Public has been one of the major themes that GEIG has studied and discussed during the course of its 19-year history. However, this theme has been a main focus of our annual conferences only once before, in 1 998, when a World Health Organization (WHO) Workshop at the European Centre for Environment and Health of the WHO in Rome, Italy, was co-organized by Colin Soskolne and Roberto Bertollini, the Centre's then Director. That Workshop included several of the founding members of GEIG. The influence of GEIG, under the leadership of Laura Westra, extended unexpectedly far in that the 1998 WHO Workshop resulted in a 1999 WHO Discussion Document, which turned out to be the most accessed document on the WHO-EURO website for the succeeding three years. It is believed to have had a rather profound advocacy role, and it can be retrieved at the following link: http : //www. colinso skolne . com/documents/WHO- 1 9 99_Discussion_Document . pdf Our latest thinking on these matters as reflected through the Prague conference will be published as the 20th anniversary collection of GEIG' s collective work, sharing the focus on public health from the 1999 WHO Discussion Document. The book is expected to be published by Earthscan (an offprint of Taylor and Francis, U.K.) for launch at the GEIG conference to take place June 18-23, 2012, La Rochelle, France. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».