MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3081180560 · doi:10.11575/prism/37702

Tap and Trade: Water Valuation as a Conservation Tool for Alberta’s Oil and Gas Industry

2019· article· en· W3081180560 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mirella Chiappe

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésValuation (finance)Petroleum industryNatural resource economicsBusinessEconomicsTap waterPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringFinanceEnvironmental engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Access to freshwater for consumption and sanitation is considered a human right, however, water also has a wide range of uses including recreation, agricultural production, and energy development. The oil and gas industry is a vital component of the Albertan and Canadian economy, contributing $89.4 billion to Alberta’s economy in 2018. The oil and gas industry uses freshwater for many volume intensive purposes making it one of the largest freshwater consumers in Alberta, using 300 million m3 in 2018 alone. However, unlike uses for agriculture and municipal servicing, freshwater used for oil and gas resource development generally becomes too contaminated to be returned to the water cycle. The permanent extraction of large amounts of freshwater can negatively affect the health of aquifers and aquatic ecosystems, and threaten potable water accessibility for communities. Water scarcity is one of the defining issues of the 21st century. For the past five years, the Global Economic Forum has identified water crises as one of the top five impacts and most likely risks facing the planet. Issues related to climate change such as droughts, varying precipitation levels, and earlier snow melt, are creating a fluctuating and unpredictable provincial water supply. The demand on Alberta’s water supply will continue to increase due to agricultural development, population growth, and the expansion of the oil and gas industry. If high usage of water continues to occur with no incentive to protect it, this resource will become increasingly scarce in the future. The province acknowledges that water has a value through its regulatory approaches. However, the province does not charge users, including oil and gas companies, when they divert and use water in a way that properly reflects this value. Standard economic principles tell us that an undervalued good will be overused. This Capstone Project analyzes and provides policy options for water conservation in Alberta’s oil and gas industry, addressing the following research question: Could water valuation play a role as a conservation tool for Alberta’s oil and gas industry to address future potential environmental challenges? To address the research question, current Alberta water policies and regulations are reviewed to understand how current water management and conservation practices impact the oil and gas industry. An analysis of the current industry water use and conservation practices is also undertaken to determine the value water provides the oil and gas industry. A literature review of different water valuation methods and their implementation in different jurisdictions is conducted to understand how this tool can be used. Three policy options that separately address the issue of whether water valuation can be integrated into water management and conservation in Alberta, are discussed. Changes to the current system of provincial water management, which relies heavily on regulation and does not utilize water valuation, would likely face opposition. As such, a policy option that does not utilize water valuation is also explored. The three options are summarized in the table below: v Policy Option Water Valuation Strategies Risks, Costs, and Considerations Benefits Update Current Regulations and Directives for Water Use in Oil and Gas Production No - Set 5-Year CEP Plans - Allow for Longer Storage and Transportation of Water - Implement the Updated Water Conservation Policy - Hidden costs such as administration costs, technological upgrading, and enforcement. - Regulatory approaches inhibit continuous improvement as they encourage firms to only undergo the minimum required - They are also slow to change and adapt to new conditions. - Regulatory approaches are seen as less controversial than implementing valuation tools Expand Provincial Water Markets Yes - Create a forum where buyers and sellers may find each other - Increase the transparency of transactions - Explore different forms of auctions - Complete WCOs and Regional Plans - Implement the Updated Water Conservation Policy - Would require intricate monitoring of supplyside factors of provincial water availability and water use - Fill information gaps related to water availability data - Would likely face backlash from the oil and gas industry - A way to ensure available and sustainable management of water, especially in times of scarcity - Allows the government to control how much water will be accessible in a given time frame based on environmental constraints - Could create incentive for the industry to develop new technologies - Would allow those firms who can reduce their water consumption the opportunity to economically benefit from trading or transferring their water allocations Impose Volumetric Pricing for Water Use Yes - The government could create a pricing scheme using a similar method to “True Value of Water” - The province could look to literature on this topic - Would be considered a corrective tax, so this would likely be the most controversial option to implement - Argument against such a tax is the belief that firms should not be allowed to pollute for a fee, but should be incentivized through regulation to adjust their behaviour - The volumetric price would act as a corrective tax, incentivizing actors to correct their negative behaviour and be more efficient in their consumption of water An extensive review of the regulations, different water valuation tools, and an analysis of publicly available information suggests that water valuation could play a role as a conservation tool for the oil and gas industry in Alberta. A foundation for water valuation through a tradable permit system has already been established in the province, and there is precedent from other Canadian jurisdictions to implement corrective taxes for water use in industry. However, due to information gaps related to water availability in the province, and stakeholder perception of usage fees, these methods would be difficult to implement at this time. This suggests that an expansion and refinement of existing provincial regulations for water use in the oil and gas industry may be a more practical approach in the short term. However, as issues related to climate change such as droughts, varying precipitation levels, and earlier snow melt, impact water availability the government will need to assess what future water uses will look like. As hydrocarbon production moves closer to larger population areas, there will be a competing interest for water. Properly valuing water use through a pricing and/or trading scheme should be seriously considered as a way to bridge the gap between the economy and the environment

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,330
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,664

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MINDMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207