Foreign Practice of Legal Groundwork for State Officials Ethical Conduct
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Foreign countries' practice as for legal groundwork for state officials conduct and public service reforms is considered. Comparative analysis of legal groundwork for state officials conduct of such countries as the USA, Canada, FRG and the UK is given. It is examined that a state official in the USA has to execute duties honestly, fairly, without giving any privileges to certain physical and legal entities. It is specified that effective reputational control is taken by state officials associations in western democracies. Therefore, for instance, there are two such associations in the USA -American Society of Public Administration and International City/County Management Association. In Canada the Commissioner's Office in Ethics and Conflicts of Interests is successfully functioning. That political institution is independent from any political forces and deals with Canadian MPs' conduct monitoring. It is established that the Structure of principal ethical rules for state officials in France is typical for democratic countries. It includes: commitment to laws and instructions; impartiality; commitment to keep secrecy; passiveness in social and political sphere; prohibition of other professional activities; loyalty; honesty. Listed above rules are considered to be foundation for state officials' ethics. On the one hand, the peculiarity of that document is to regulate professional activities ethics for officials, on the other hand, it determines state officials' duties. In accordance with conducted research results, it is revealed that Codes of conduct for state officials are normally adopted to stand against corruption and prevent conflict of interests. It is considered that one of the principal factors to stand against corruption is professional state official ethics. We have made a conclusion that in spite of differences in several countries approaches to state officials organizational culture formation, its goal remains unchangeable -to provide officials' professional activities in the society's interests, to prevent possible abuse of authority and breach of the law. Functioning effectiveness and given practice application in modern Ukraine in present conditions in order to provide effective reforms of state service system are stipulated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle