Jump Height Estimation Using a Single Wearable Inertial Sensor Mounted on Sacrum
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vertical jump performance assessment has been used as a tool to study and monitor physical performance in both athletic and non-athletic populations. One of the key parameters describing vertical jump performance is jump height. Although various methods are available for measuring the height, force platforms (FP) are the most precise, accurate, and reliable instrument, usually taken as the gold standard method. As force platforms are expensive and may not be practical outside of the lab environment, using wearable technologies like tri-axial inertial sensors (IS) is an inexpensive and reliable alternative. The objective of this study is to examine the technical validity and ability of using a sacrum mounted IS to estimate jump height. For this purpose, seven participants (age 26.3 2.0 years) were recruited. Each participant was asked to perform two standing countermovement vertical jumps without arm swing on a FP (AMTI, USA. Sampling frequency = 2000Hz) while a tri-axial measurement sensor (Xsens, Netherland, Sampling Frequency = 100Hz) was placed on the sacrum. Standing countermovement jump is a widely used type of jump since it is easy to perform and closely related to movements in sports. The flight time was measured by finding the take-off and landing instants detected by analyzing the local peaks in the free vertical acceleration signal. Then, using the flight time measured by a single IS, the jump heights were estimated. Additionally, the jump heights for all the recorded jumps were calculated by implementing the take-off velocity method using the vertical component of the ground reaction force measured by the FP. Strong linear correlations were found between flight time found by FP and IS (R 2 = 0.76, S = 0 1 Sec), take-off velocity calculated by FP and flight time found by IS (R 2 = 0.80, S = 0.017 0.005 m/s), and jump height estimated using FP and IS (R 2 = 0.79, S = 0.05 0.01 m). Although the accuracy of this method, which employs the single wearable IS mounted on the sacrum, is sensitive to the take-off and landing time, there is error in jump height estimation (2cm 1). This study demonstrates the accuracy of using a single IS in comparison to a FP to estimate standing countermovement jump height. Further investigations on a larger study sample are needed, however, wearable IS have the potential to accurately assess the physical performance of individuals in a rapid and portable manner.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle