Commentary: Should the surgical tactics of segmentectomy be planned on the anatomy of the segmental veins?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageRight upper lobe segmentectomies are facilitated by standardized surgical approaches based on anatomical modeling of the venous drainage and intersegmental veins of the right upper lobe.See Article page 288. Right upper lobe segmentectomies are facilitated by standardized surgical approaches based on anatomical modeling of the venous drainage and intersegmental veins of the right upper lobe. See Article page 288. Currently, the role of sublobar resection in the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a hot topic. While guidelines support the use of segmentectomy to treat early-stage NSCLC presenting as pure ground-glass opacity or predominantly ground-glass opacity in patients fit for surgery,1National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 08.2020. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2020.Google Scholar the use of segmentectomy to treat solid NSCLC lesions is still controversial.2Nakamura H. Taniguchi Y. Miwa K. Adachi Y. Fujioka S. Haruki T. et al.Comparison of the surgical outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 59: 137-141Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar The results of 2 controlled randomized trials (Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance 140503 and Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0802) are awaited and should shed light on this exciting question.3Comparison of Different Types of Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT00499330Date accessed: August 20, 2020Google Scholar,4Nakamura K. Saji H. Nakajima R. Okada M. Asamura H. Shibata T. et al.A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non–small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L).Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40: 271-274Crossref PubMed Scopus (444) Google Scholar The number of segmentectomies performed each year continues to increase despite the well-recognized complexity of the procedure caused by numerous bronchovascular anatomical variations. In the current issue of JTCVS Techniques, Nakazawa and colleagues present a standardized approach for right upper lobe (RUL) segmentectomy based on the venous drainage pattern and identification of the intersegmental veins.5Nakazawa S. Shimizu K. Kawatani N. Obayashi K. Ohtaki Y. Nagashima T. et al.Right upper lobe segmentectomy guided by simplified anatomical models.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 288-297Google Scholar Thirty-four patients underwent preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the RUL bronchovascular structures then underwent segmentectomy guided by the computed tomography findings. The authors, using anatomical modeling they previously described,6Nagashima T. Shimizu K. Ohtaki Y. Obayashi K. Kakegawa S. Nakazawa S. et al.An analysis of variations in the bronchovascular pattern of the right upper lobe using three-dimensional CT angiography and bronchography.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 63: 354-360Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar,7Shimizu K. Nagashima T. Ohtaki Y. Obayashi K. Nakazawa S. Kamiyoshihara M. et al.Analysis of the variation pattern in right upper pulmonary veins and establishment of simplified vein models for anatomical segmentectomy.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 64: 604-611Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar classified the anatomy of the RUL main vein branches into 1 of 4 major types, and the drainage pattern of the intersegmental veins was classified into 1 of 14 subtypes. Based on this classification, an anterior, interlobar, or posterior/bronchial approach was used to perform the segmentectomy, which facilitated identification of the intersegmental vein and, consequently, its division. All patients were classified into 1 of 4 previously described anatomical models. Importantly, in 4 patients (12%), the standard approach to RUL segmentectomy was changed because an uncommon anatomical subtype was identified. The article by Nakazawa and colleagues highlights the importance of surgical planning before complex procedures. A systematic and methodic surgical approach guided by preoperative imaging studies of the drainage pattern of the RUL veins can potentially optimize surgical outcomes. With the use of this objective surgical tactic, hesitation and futile movements are reduced, favoring a fluid anatomical dissection with precise identification of the segmental vein. Moreover, accurate recognition of the anatomy of the intersegmental veins and their spatial relationship with the tumor might enable better definition of the surgical margins. Interestingly, 8 of the 34 patients underwent bi-segmentectomy, segmentectomy plus subsegmentectomy, or 2 subsegmentectomies from adjacent segments. We speculate that the authors' anatomical modeling was a decisive factor in electing these types of resection and contributed to their success. Our main concerns with this anatomical model are its reproducibility and applicability to day-to-day practice. It is well known that there is great value in understanding lobar anatomy with the use of preoperative 3-dimensional reconstructions methods. However, the authors went a step further to propose surgical strategies after classifying the anatomic variations of RUL vein branches. Despite a great effort from the authors to simplify RUL segmentectomies and the excellent oncologic and surgical outcomes, this surgical strategy is not intuitive. Also, due to the small sample size, the impact of this proposed model on clinical practice remains unclear. We congratulate the authors for their innovative concept and outstanding work trying to simplify a complex procedure through the knowledge of the anatomy of the segmental RUL veins. We believe that standardizing complex procedures improves outcomes. Here, the authors have shown that coupling routine modeling with standardized surgical approaches to segmentectomy is feasible. Certainly, the readers will have a different perspective while planning and performing RUL segmentectomies after reading this study. Right upper lobe segmentectomy guided by simplified anatomic modelsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewTo standardize the technical strategy for right upper lobe (RUL) segmentectomy, we previously developed simplified 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic models that classify the RUL anatomy into 14 patterns according to the branching pattern of bronchi and veins. We aimed to study the surgical outcome of RUL segmentectomy guided by these simplified anatomic models. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».