Geographic heterogeneity impacts drug resistance predictions in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The efficacy of antibiotic drug treatments in tuberculosis (TB) is significantly threatened by the development of drug resistance. There is a need for a robust diagnostic system that can accurately predict drug resistance in patients. In recent years, researchers have been taking advantage of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to infer antibiotic resistance. In this work we investigate the power of machine learning tools in inferring drug resistance from WGS data on three distinct datasets differing in their geographical diversity. We analyzed data from the Relational Sequencing TB Data Platform, which comprises global isolates from 32 different countries, the PATRIC database, containing isolates contributed by researchers around the world, and isolates collected by the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control in Canada. We predicted drug resistance to the first-line drugs: isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and streptomycin. We focused on the genes which previous evidence suggests are involved in drug resistance in TB. We called single-nucleotide polymorphisms using the Snippy pipeline, then applied different machine learning models. Following best practices, we chose the best parameters for each model via cross-validation on the training set and evaluated the performance via the sensitivity-specificity tradeoffs on the testing set. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to predict antibiotic resistance in TB across multiple datasets. We obtained a performance comparable to that seen in previous studies, but observed that performance may be negatively affected when training on one dataset and testing on another, suggesting the importance of geographical heterogeneity in drug resistance predictions. In addition, we investigated the importance of each gene within each model, and recapitulated some previously known biology of drug resistance. This study paves the way for further investigations, with the ultimate goal of creating an accurate, interpretable and globally generalizable model for predicting drug resistance in TB. Author summary Drug resistance in pathogenic bacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be predicted by an application of machine learning models to next-generation sequencing data. The received wisdom is that following standard protocols for training commonly used machine learning models should produce accurate drug resistance predictions. In this paper, we propose an important caveat to this idea. Specifically, we show that considering geographical diversity is critical for making accurate predictions, and that different geographic regions may have disparate drug resistance mechanisms that are predominant. By comparing the results within and across a regional dataset and two international datasets, we show that model performance may vary dramatically between settings. In addition, we propose a new method for extracting the most important variants responsible for predicting resistance to each first-line drug, and show that it is to recapitulate a large amount of what is known about the biology of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».