MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3087109816 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.066

Commentary: Up, down, right, left: Addressing the shortage of donor lungs for transplantation

2020· editorial· en· W3087109816 sur OpenAlex
Elliot Wakeam, Andrew C. Chang

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEconomic shortageDonationLung transplantationMedicineTransplantationLungSurgeryIntensive care medicinePolitical scienceInternal medicineLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageAlthough an innovative approach to extending the use of donor lungs is described, continued efforts to improve overall donation rate should be pursued.See Article page 395. Although an innovative approach to extending the use of donor lungs is described, continued efforts to improve overall donation rate should be pursued. See Article page 395. Worldwide, donor lungs for lung transplantation remain in short supply. In no country is this shortage as acute as it is in Japan, where donation rates remain low due to cultural and other factors. As a result, Japanese lung transplant surgeons are renown for their creativity and technical prowess in addressing this shortage. Chida and colleagues1Chida M. Araki O. Karube Y. Maeda S. Right-to-left inverted single lung transplantation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 395-397Google Scholar from Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine detail their technique of right-to-left inverted single lung transplantation—an extension of the work that has been done in Japan to pioneer living donor lung transplantation and other techniques to address the donor shortage. They should be commended for describing this complex, technical operation. In North America, the reasons for donor lung shortages are not related to a low rate of donation, but rather to a low rate of use by surgeons of potentially eligible donor lungs. In the United States especially, where the majority of lung transplantation is done in relatively low-volume centers, many useable donor lungs are discarded. Several reports have confirmed that decline of lungs for quality or other reasons on the US donor list does not indicate that lungs are not usable, in fact Cypel and colleagues2Cypel M. Outcomes of lung transplantation at a Canadian center using donors from the United States. Presented at: the 100th Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery:A Virtual Learning Experience; May 22-23, 2020.Google Scholar from the Toronto Lung Transplant Program have detailed their experience using lungs declined across the United States and found no difference in outcomes of these versus standard donor lungs from Canada. Other reports have shown that regardless of where a lung is accepted on the US match run list, the outcomes do not differ, implying that declines at the top of the list are not reliable markers of organ quality.3Singh E. Schecter M. Towe C. Rizwan R. Roosevelt B. Tweddell J. et al.Sequence of refusals for donor quality, organ utilization, and survival after lung transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019; 38: 35-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar The reasons for this are myriad, and include lack of specialized training in lung transplant, little experience with salvage techniques for marginal donors such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and others, but certainly an unwillingness to take on risk because of the implications for United Network for Organ Sharing reporting and regulatory backlash also play a role. The report from Chida and colleagues1Chida M. Araki O. Karube Y. Maeda S. Right-to-left inverted single lung transplantation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 395-397Google Scholar is an impressive technical feat, and the authors should be congratulated on the successful implementation of this technique. However, given the relative number of donors and recipients in the United States, the applicability of a complex technique is questionable in this country, when simply making the decision to use a greater number of standard donors would suffice. Changing our decision making en masse is no easy feat, and would require a concerted effort from national policy makers to encourage greater use of donor organs in centers of excellence. If we could stop turning down so many lungs, we could use them up—and we would not need to flip them from right to left. Right-to-left inverted single lung transplantationJTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewDonor shortage is a critical issue in some areas; thus, single-lung transplantation remains popular. In most countries, a scoring system has been established that allows for the neediest patients to have priority for receiving a donor organ, and it is important to perform lung transplantation using any available lung in those cases. In some patients with uneven disease laterality, transplantation for the worst side is usually suitable, although waiting for a specific side may lose the opportunity for lung transplantation. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,107
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,378
Écart entre enseignants0,339 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle