Commentary: Opening a window when surgeons face awesome responses to immunotherapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageVarying tumor response patterns to immune checkpoint inhibitors have been observed. Some patients will benefit from aggressive, well-planned surgical excision and reconstruction.See Article page 329. Varying tumor response patterns to immune checkpoint inhibitors have been observed. Some patients will benefit from aggressive, well-planned surgical excision and reconstruction. See Article page 329. Immunotherapy has profoundly changed the paradigm in the treatment of several solid tumors over the past decade. In metastatic and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas not amenable to curative resection, immune checkpoint inhibition with cemiplimab have shown a 47% objective response rate.1Migden M.R. Rischin D. Schmults C.D. Guminski A. Hauschild A. Lewis K.D. et al.PD-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma.N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 341-351Crossref PubMed Scopus (745) Google Scholar Another phase 2 open-label study including patients with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, showed a 44% objective response rate with cemiplimab using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.2Migden M.R. Khushalani N.I. Chang A.L.S. Lewis K.D. Schmults C.D. Hernandez-Aya L. et al.Cemiplimab in locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: results from an open-label, phase 2, single-arm trial.Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21: 294-305Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (210) Google Scholar In many patients, the significant local response to immunotherapy and associated tumor shrinkage/contraction may change surgical planning. Some tumors considered nonamenable to curative resection, by the predicted impossibility of achieving a complete resection, patient-related clinical conditions, or the aggressiveness of the resection, have shown an impressive reduction after immunotherapy leading to a reconsideration of aggressive surgical excision. We enthusiastically enjoyed the report by Choi and colleagues,3Choi J.J. Allen R.J. Bains M.S. Cohen M.A. Yu Y. Elmadhun N. et al.Complex chest wall surgery to prevent vascular complications after immunotherapy and radiation treatment.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 329-331Google Scholar which describes the successful resection of a large cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with chest wall and thoracic inlet invasion. Notably, after 2 cycles of cemiplimab and 1 cycle of radiotherapy, the tumor underwent a significant superficial contraction with associated new bone erosion and close contact with the subclavian vessels. The decision for aggressive resection was justified to prevent potential catastrophic bleeding. Image-based tumor burden evaluation in patients receiving immunotherapy is sometimes challenging because the tumors can exhibit many patterns of response after delivery of treatment. Pseudoprogression and dissociated responses have been observed in many solid tumors after immunotherapy and are associated with better survival than true progression. However, tumor growth or the development of new lesions can be observed in these scenarios. Especially in cases of dissociated responses, a window for surgical treatment may open and must not be neglected. The decision to continue delivery of a drug versus proceed with aggressive surgical excision must be taken individually with consideration of the clinical features and the possibility of achieving complete resection. Biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA4Cabel L. Proudhon C. Romano E. Girard N. Lantz O. Stern M.H. et al.Clinical potential of circulating tumour DNA in patients receiving anticancer immunotherapy.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018; 15: 639-650Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar and chromosomal instability quantification of cell-free DNA5Weiss G.J. Beck J. Braun D.P. Bornemann-Kolatzki K. Barilla H. Cubello R. et al.Tumor cell-free DNA copy number instability predicts therapeutic response to immunotherapy.Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23: 5074-5081Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar are showing encouraging accuracy in evaluating response to immunotherapy and might be another useful tool in surgical decision making in the near future. In the case presented by Choi and colleagues3Choi J.J. Allen R.J. Bains M.S. Cohen M.A. Yu Y. Elmadhun N. et al.Complex chest wall surgery to prevent vascular complications after immunotherapy and radiation treatment.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 329-331Google Scholar the decision to proceed with resection of such a large tumor was accompanied by the need to reconstruct the chest wall. Acellular collagen matrix patches combine rigidity and durability needed for chest stabilization, along with easy handling and strength for suture fixation. It also allows a remodeling process with tissue integration and neovascularization, which may reduce infection risk and help with healing.6Schmidt J. Redwan B. Koesek V. Heitplatz B. Bedetti B. Aebert H. et al.Thoracic wall reconstruction with acellular porcine dermal collagen matrix.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 64: 245-251Google Scholar Because the chest wall offers significant stretch, the collagen matrix's tissue origin must be considered when selecting the prosthesis, due to the fact that the porcine origin matrix apparently offers more stretch resistance than those from humans. Prosthetic patches must always be covered with well-vascularized tissue flaps, preferentially muscle or omentum. We congratulate the authors for the surgical and oncological success in this complex case. Complex chest wall surgery to prevent vascular complications after immunotherapy and radiation treatmentJTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewA 64-year-old woman with diabetes presented with extensive destruction of the right anterior chest wall and thoracic inlet. A computed tomographic scan of the chest showed a large necrotic mass (20 × 20 cm), with marked destruction of the right clavicle and focal destruction of the manubrium (Figure 1). Biopsy yielded poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with unknown programmed death-ligand 1 status. The patient gave written informed consent for the publication of this case. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».