A Half-Century of Evidence-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Historical Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To review the achievements of cardiac exercise rehabilitation programs retrospectively and to identify continuing challenges to their success. METHODS: A review of files accumulated while working with the Toronto Rehabilitation Center, updated by articles identified by PUB-MED, OVID, and Google Scholar through February 2019. RESULTS: After the early lead of Israeli physicians, cardiac rehabilitation began in Ontario during the 1960s and quickly attracted a large case load. Recurrence rates of the patients recruited were low relative to those receiving standard medical treatment, even after allowing for differences in risk factors at entry to programs. Controlled trials began but were individually of insufficient in size to show a significant reduction in recurrences or mortality. Subsequently, multiple meta-analyses demonstrated a 20% to 25% reduction of all-cause and cardiac mortality over the first few years of follow-up in patients who persisted with their rehabilitation. Compliance continued a problem at many centers, but special features of the Toronto cardiac rehabilitation program sustained a compliance of 82.8% over 3 years. Although vigorous exercise increased the immediate risks of a recurrence 5- to 10-fold, this was more than offset by the long-term benefits of enhanced physical condition, and cardiac deaths were a rarity during either supervised or home-based exercise sessions. About a half of patients developed a depression immediately after infarction, but if encouraged to persist with prescribed exercise, their quality of life progressively improved. Among the wide variety of mechanisms underlying the benefits of exercise, gains of aerobic power seemed particularly important. With sustained training, the physical condition of some younger patients progressed to the point of participating successfully in marathon events. Older patients also benefited from sustained training, but for them, optimal results were likely associated with less rigorous physical demands. CONCLUSIONS: Research conducted in Toronto and elsewhere has established the benefits of exercise-centered cardiac rehabilitation. However, there remains a need to define the optimum timing of program onset, and the frequency, intensity, and duration of supervised training sessions. Return to blue-collar occupations also needs to be boosted, and the limited participation of eligible patients in available programs remains a continuing challenge.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,047 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,013 | 0,016 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».